Table 4. Population-wise comparison of percentage polymorphism (%P), Nei’s gene diversity (Hi) and Bayesian heterozygosity (HS) values determined from ISSR-PCR data and Nei’s average gene heterozygosity (HT) values determined from SSR-PCR data. n.d. = not detectable. Hap: Number of haplotypes.
| Populations | ISSR | SSR | ||||
| % (P) | Nei’s Hi | Bayesian HS | Hap | HT | ||
| CULTIVATED POPULATIONS (Lower Assam Region) | ||||||
| Boko | 80 | 0.29±0.19 | 0.29±0.01 | 6 | 0.25 | |
| Mangaldoi* | 82 | 0.32±0.18 | 0.31±0.02 | 9 | 0.28 | |
| Guwahati* | 78 | 0.31±0.25 | 0.30±0.02 | 6 | 0.32 | |
| Sualkuchi* | 52 | 0.20±0.21 | 0.22±0.01 | 5 | 0.20 | |
| Goalpara* | 54 | 0.19±0.20 | 0.21±0.02 | 5 | 0.26 | |
| CULTIVATED POPULATIONS (Upper Assam Region) | ||||||
| Mariani | 52 | 0.18±0.20 | 0.19±0.02 | 1 | n. d. | |
| Dhemaji* | 58 | 0.25±0.23 | 0.28±0.02 | 1 | n. d. | |
| Diksaw | 64 | 0.22±0.19 | 0.21±0.01 | 1 | n. d. | |
| Kohargaon | 44 | 0.15±0.20 | 0.21±0.02 | 1 | n. d. | |
| Titabor | 30 | 0.09±0.17 | 0.14±0.01 | 1 | n. d. | |
| Lakhimpur | 40 | 0.14±0.20 | 0.17±0.02 | 1 | n. d. | |
| WILD POPULATIONS (Shillong Plateau Region) | ||||||
| Hahim* | 64 | 0.35±0.18 | 0.31±0.01 | 7 | 0.36 | |
| Manipur* | 58 | 0.23±0.22 | 0.27±0.02 | 4 | 0.29 | |
| Turah* | 78 | 0.27±0.20 | 0.26±0.02 | 8 | 0.36 | |
| Agropetal | 90 | 0.38±0.16 | 0.26±0.02 | 13 | 0.54 | |
Asterisks (*) indicate populations from which selected loci were cloned and sequenced. Populations with highest and lowest genetic diversity estimates are shown in bold.