Table 3. Other efficacy parameter results (ITT population).
| Placebo, N=395 | Linaclotide 290 μg, N=405 | Difference | P value | NNT (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worst abdominal pain | |||||
| Mean (11-point NRS scale) | 4.4 | 3.7 | |||
| aChange from baseline, meanb,c | −1.1 | −1.9 | −0.7 | <0.0001 | |
| a% of patients with ≥30% decrease in worst abdominal pain for at least 6/12 weeksd | 37.5 | 50.1 | 12.7 | 0.0003 | 7.9 (5.1, 17.1) |
| Abdominal discomfort | |||||
| Mean (11-point NRS scale) | 4.7 | 4.1 | |||
| aChange from baseline, meanb,c | −1.2 | −2.0 | −0.7 | <0.0001 | |
| % of patients with ≥30% decrease in abdominal discomfort for at least 6/12 weeksd | 37.0 | 48.1 | 11.2 | 0.0013 | 8.9 (5.6, 22.8) |
| Abdominal bloating | |||||
| Mean (11-point NRS scale) | 5.3 | 4.6 | |||
| aChange from baseline, meanb,c | −1.1 | −1.9 | −0.8 | <0.0001 | |
| % of patients with ≥30% decrease in abdominal bloating for at least 6/12 weeksd | 29.9 | 43.5 | 13.6 | <0.0001 | 7.4 (5.0, 14.3) |
| Abdominal fullness | |||||
| Mean (11-point NRS scale) | 5.3 | 4.6 | |||
| Change from baseline, meanb,c | −1.1 | −2.0 | −0.9 | <0.0001 | |
| % of patients with ≥30% decrease in abdominal fullness for at least 6/12 weeksd | 32.9 | 44.0 | 11.0 | 0.0012 | 9.1 (5.6, 23.0) |
| Abdominal cramping | |||||
| Mean (11-point NRS scale) | 4.1 | 3.5 | |||
| Change from baseline, meanb,c | −1.1 | −1.7 | −0.6 | <0.0001 | |
| % of patients with ≥30% decrease in abdominal cramping for at least 6/12 weeksd | 39.5 | 49.9 | 10.4 | 0.0029 | 9.6 (5.8, 28.3) |
| CSBMs | |||||
| Mean CSBMs/week | 1.0 | 2.6 | |||
| aChange from baseline, meanb,c | 0.7 | 2.3 | 1.6 | <0.0001 | |
| CSBM ≤24 h first dose (%)c | 13.2 | 32.3 | 19.2 | <0.0001 | 5.2 (4.0, 7.4) |
| a% of patients w/ CSBM rate increase ≥1 per week for at least 6/12 weeksd | 29.6 | 48.6 | 19.0 | <0.0001 | 5.3 (3.9, 8.1) |
| SBMs | |||||
| Mean SBMs/week | 3.2 | 6.0 | |||
| aChange from baselineb,c | 1.1 | 3.9 | 2.8 | <0.0001 | |
| SBM ≤24 h after first dose (%)c | 43.8 | 67.4 | 23.6 | <0.0001 | 4.2 (3.3, 5.9) |
| % of patients w/ SBM rate increase ≥2 per week from baseline for at least 6/12 weeksd | 29.4 | 57.5 | 28.2 | <0.0001 | 3.6 (2.9, 4.6) |
| Stool consistency | |||||
| Mean BSFS score (1–7) | 3.1 | 4.5 | |||
| aChange from baseline, meanb,c | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.4 | <0.0001 | |
| Mean weekly % of SBMs without hard or lumpy stools (BSFS ≥3) | 60.7 | 79.4 | 18.7 | <0.0001 | |
| Straining | |||||
| Mean straining score (1–5) | 2.8 | 2.2 | |||
| aChange from baseline, meanb,c | −0.7 | −1.3 | −0.7 | <0.0001 | |
| Mean weekly % of SBMs without significant straining (i.e., score ≤3) | 71.7 | 85.3 | 13.6 | <0.0001 | |
| Constipation severity | |||||
| Mean constipation severity score (1–5) | 3.1 | 2.6 | |||
| Change from baseline, meanb,c | −0.6 | −1.2 | −0.6 | <0.0001 | |
| % of patients with decrease of ≥1 for at least 6/12 weeksd | 42.5 | 59.5 | 17.0 | <0.0001 | 5.9 (4.2, 9.9) |
| IBS severity | |||||
| Mean IBS severity score (1–5) | 3.1 | 2.7 | |||
| Change from baseline, meanb,c | −0.5 | −1.0 | −0.5 | <0.0001 | |
| % of patients with decrease of ≥1 for at least 6/12 weeksd | 37.5 | 56.3 | 18.8 | <0.0001 | 5.3 (3.9, 8.3) |
| Adequate relief | |||||
| % of patients reporting adequate relief of IBS symptoms for at least 75% of the weeks (i.e., 9/12 weeks)d | 21.3 | 36.8 | 15.5 | <0.0001 | 6.4 (4.6, 10.7) |
| % of patients reporting adequate relief of IBS symptoms for at least 50% of the weeks (i.e., 6/12 weeks)d | 34.2 | 48.9 | 14.7 | <0.0001 | 6.8 (4.7, 12.6) |
| Degree of reliefe | |||||
| % of patients reporting “Somewhat Relieved,” “Considerably Relieved,” or “Completely Relieved” for 100% of the weekly scores or “Considerably Relieved” or “Completely Relieved” for at least 50% of the weekly scoresd | 24.3 | 41.2 | 16.9 | <0.0001 | 5.9 (4.3, 9.5) |
BSFS, Bristol Stool Forms Scale; CI, confidence interval; CSBM, complete SBM; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; ITT, intent-to-treat; NNT, number needed to treat; NRS, numerical rating scale; SBM, spontaneous bowel movement.
Secondary end point.
Changes from baseline are the least-squares means from the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model.
P values were based on a comparison of linaclotide vs. the placebo group using the ANCOVA model.
P values were based on a comparison of linaclotide vs. the placebo group using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test.
Degree of Relief scale: 1=completely relieved; 2=considerably relieved; 3=somewhat relieved; 4=unchanged; 5=somewhat worse; 6=considerably worse; 7=as bad as I can imagine.