Table 2.
Product image assessments of 30 PDA samples.
| PDA no. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | S-C value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.67 |
| 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.33 |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3.33 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3.67 |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.67 |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.33 |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2.33 |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.33 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6.33 |
| 10 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3.33 |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4.67 |
| 12 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.67 |
| 13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.33 |
| 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2.33 |
| 15 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2.33 |
| 16 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4.67 |
| 17 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7.33 |
| 18 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8.33 |
| 19 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4.67 |
| 20 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.67 |
| 21 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5.67 |
| 22 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.67 |
| 23 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1.33 |
| 24 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4.67 |
| 25* | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5.33 |
| 26* | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.33 |
| 27* | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.33 |
| 28* | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.67 |
| 29* | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.33 |
| 30* | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4.33 |
*Mean that the 6 PDA samples are the test set for quantitative analysis models.