Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 8;13:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-133

Table 2.

Implication for CKD staging when an enzymatic or a standardized serumcreatinine is used

 
 
MDRD enzymatic p10/ p90
 
 
<30 ml/min/1.73 m2
30-45 ml/min/1.73 m2
45-60 ml/min/1.73 m2
60-90 ml/min/1.73 m2
>90 ml/min/1.73 m2
Total
    p10 p90 p10 p90 p10 p90 p10 p90 p10 p90  
MDRD standardized
<30 ml/min/1.73 m2
2483 (97.6%)
2543 (100%)
60 (2.4%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
2543
 
30-45 ml/min/1.73 m2
0 (0%)
141 (3.6%)
3299 (84.4%)
3768 (96.4%)
610 (15.6%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
3909
 
45-60 ml/min/1.73 m2
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
338 (4.1%)
5740 (69.9%)
7878 (95.9%)
2476 (30.1%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
8216
 
60-90 ml/min/1.73 m2
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
845 (2.1%)
28308 (71.1%)
38976 (97.9%)
11513 (28.9%)
0 (%)
39821
 
>90 ml/min/1.73 m2
5 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
1502 (5.4%)
27930 (100%)
26433 (94.6%)
27935
    2488 2684 3359 4106 6350 8723 30784 40478 39443 26433 82424

Crosstabulation showing the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) stages when the modification of diet in renal disease equation (MDRD) is calculated with a standardized serumcreatinine versus a serumcreatinine as measured by a p10 (10th percentile) or a p90 (90th percentile) laboratory using an enzymatic technique.