Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 23;3:401. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00401

Table 1.

Summary of previously published analyses of unexpected taxonomic character distributions.

Reference Character Results Conclusion
Pearson et al. (2003) Sterol synthesis Basal branching HGT
Chen et al. (2007) Sterol synthesis Basal branching HGT
Desmond and Gribaldo (2009) Sterol synthesis Basal and internal branching HGT or VGT
Frickey and Kannenberg (2009) Sterol synthesis Intermediate HGT or VGT
Jenkins et al. (2002) Tubulin Basal branching VGT
Pilhofer et al. (2011) Tubulin Basal branching VGT
Chistoserdova et al. (2004) Methanogenesis Intermediate VGT
Bauer et al. (2004) Methanogenesis Intermediate HGT or VGT
Vorholt et al. (2005) Methylotrophy Intermediate VGT
Kalyuzhnaya et al. (2005) Methylotrophy Basal branching HGT
Op den Camp et al. (2009) Methanotrophy Intermediate VGT
Dunfield et al. (2007) Methanotrophy Internal branching VGT
Khadem et al. (2011) Rubisco Intermediate VGT

For each publication (citation provided in the “Reference” column), the table indicates the character analyzed, a summary of the phylogenetic relationships (“Results”), and conclusions reached in the reference concerning the evolutionary origins of the unexpected character distributions (“Conclusions”). In the “Results” column, according to the trees presented in the publication: “Basal Branching” indicates that the most recent lineage (i.e., branch) common to the ancestry of sequences from both PVC and other organisms is near the root of the tree; “Internal Branching” indicates that one or more PVC genes are more closely related to a specific subset of eukaryotes than they are to others (i.e., the PVC genes emerged from “within” the eukaryotes); “Intermediate” indicates that the unrooted phylogenies contain three clusters (i.e., clans) of sequences (PVC, non-PVC bacteria, and others). In the “Conclusions” column: “HGT” indicates that the most likely scenario for the evolution of the gene family was inferred to involve some instance of HGT; “VGT” (vertical gene transfer) indicates that the most likely scenario for the evolution of the gene family was inferred NOT to involve HGT; “HGT or VGT” indicates that the authors considered the evidence to provide similar levels of support for the HGT and VGT alternatives.