Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soft Matter. 2012 Sep 27;8(46):11723–11731. doi: 10.1039/C2SM26572A

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

ln(Lc) and ln(Lp) vs. ln(μ) (A) and ln(Λ) (B), the solid and dash line is the linear fitting results. In panel A, the adjusted R2 of ln(Lc) vs. ln(μ) is 0.962, the intercept is 3.291, and the slope is −0.135; the adjusted R2 of ln(Lp) vs. ln(μ) is 0.970, the intercept is 4.024, and the slope is 0.192. In panel B, the adjusted R2 of ln(Lc) vs. ln(Λ) is 0.965, intercept is 3.937, and the slope is −0.154; the adjusted R2 of ln(Lp) vs. ln(Λ) is 0.975, the intercept is 3.105, and the slope is 0.220.