Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Aug 21;37(6):843–852. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.137

Table 1.

Influence of restricted feeding on the phase and amplitude of diurnal variations in energy balance parameters. Mice were fed standard laboratory chow in an ad libitum (Ad Lib; n=44) fashion, followed by random assignment to dark phase (DP; n=21) or light phase (LP; n=23) restricted feeding groups. All parameters were monitored continuously using a CLAMS; restricted feeding was enforced in an automated manner by a CLAMS. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. Phase is the zeitgeber time (ZT; in hours) at which the peak value in the oscillation occurs. Food intake, energy expenditure, and activity units for amplitude (i.e., peak-to-trough difference) are g, kcals/hr, and number of beam breaks, respectively.

Phase Amplitude
Ad Lib DP LP Ad Lib DP LP
Food Intake 13.9 ± 0.1 16.7 ± 0.1* 5.9 ± 0.1*$ 0.04 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.01* 0.06 ± 0.02
Energy Expenditure 15.7 ± 0.1 17.3 ± 0.1* 10.7 ± 0.2*$ 0.18 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.02 0.17 ± 0.01$
RER 13.6 ± 0.2 18.4 ± 0.2* 8.1 ± 0.1*$ 0.08 ± 0.01 0.25 ± 0.01* 0.31 ± 0.01*$
Activity 15.4 ± 0.2 16.6 ± 0.2* 16.1 ± 0.3* 253 ± 59 634 ± 313 410 ± 95
*

p<0.05 compared to Ad Lib fed conditions (paired t-test);

$

p<0.05 for DP versus LP fed mice (unpaired t-test).