Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Aug 21;37(6):843–852. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.137

Table 2.

Influence of restricted feeding on multiple energy balance parameters. Mice were fed standard laboratory chow in an ad libitum (Ad Lib; n=44) fashion, followed by random assignment to dark phase (DP; n=21) or light phase (LP; n=23) restricted feeding groups. All parameters were monitored continuously using a CLAMS; restricted feeding was enforced in an automated manner by a CLAMS. Data for food intake (g) and activity (beam breaks) are totals (i.e., the sum during a distinct time period), while data for energy expenditure (kcals/hr) and RER are averages (i.e., the average during a distinct time period). Data are reported as mean ± SEM.

12h Light Period Total/Average 12h Dark Period Total/Average 24h Daily Total/Average
Ad Lib LP DP Ad Lib LP DP Ad Lib LP DP
Food Intake 1.53 ± 0.05 3.97 ± 0.08* 0.00 ± 0.00*$ 2.30 ± 0.05 0.00 ± 0.00* 3.60 ± 0.07*$ 3.83 ± 0.08 3.97 ± 0.08 3.60 ± 0.07$
Energy Expenditure 0.34 ± 0.01 0.38 ± 0.01* 0.29 ± 0.01*$ 0.45 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.01* 0.46 ± 0.01$ 0.39 ± 0.01 0.36 ± 0.01* 0.38 ± 0.01
RER 0.93 ± 0.01 1.09 ± 0.01* 0.84 ± 0.01*$ 0.96 ± 0.00 0.90 ± 0.01* 1.05 ± 0.00*$ 0.95 ± 0.00 0.99 ± 0.00* 0.94 ± 0.00$
Activity 7638 ± 500 6337 ± 586 8068 ± 822 12811 ± 764 13748 ± 938 14805 ± 997 20449 ± 1178 20084 ± 1352 22874 ± 1717
*

p<0.05 compared to Ad Lib fed conditions (paired t-test);

$

p<0.05 for DP versus LP fed mice (unpaired t-test).