Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 10;13(6):759–770. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0353-0

TABLE 1.

Hair cell survival (percent of control) and ED50 of protection after pretreatment with increasing doses of quinoline derivative followed by 200 μM neomycin treatment

Drug Protective drug concentration ED50 (μM) Treatment effect; p value (ANOVA)
0 μM 10 μM 50 μM 100 μM 200 μM Drug alone (no neo)
Amsacrine 16 ± 6 103 ± 12** 108 ± 10** 102 ± 19** 102 ± 8** 107 ± 10 4 F(4, 43) = 105.51, p < 0.0001
Quinine 24 ± 9 94 ± 10** 101 ± 12** 102 ± 10** 74 ± 28** 64 ± 24 4 F(4, 45) = 41.34, p < 0.0001
Mefloquine 20 ± 6 88 ± 8** 95 ± 13** 103 ± 17** 85 ± 14** 82 ± 11 6 F(4, 40) = 73.48, p < 0.0001
Cinchonidine 18 ± 8 59 ± 15** 91 ± 15** 99 ± 7** 103 ± 11** 101 ± 8 160 F(4, 45) = 91.46, p < 0.0001
Amodiaquine 13 ± 8 49 ± 7** 64 ± 18** 85 ± 15** 101 ± 8** 94 ± 9 40 F(4, 44) = 51.19, p < 0.0001
Chloroquine 33 ± 13 30 ± 20 64 ± 16** 65 ± 20** 95 ± 10** 104 ± 11 50 F(4, 41) = 25.15, p < 0.0001
Cinchonine 17 ± 11 52 ± 13** 50 ± 9** 61 ± 10** 78 ± 12** 104 ± 18 64 F(4, 43) = 37.15, p < 0.0001
Tacrine 15 ± 6 22 ± 7 41 ± 8** 53 ± 10** 86 ± 16** 106 ± 12 92 F(4, 45) = 74.83, p < 0.0001

Drug alone column indicates hair cell survival in the presence of 200 μM quinoline derivative without neomycin

**p < 0.01, Tukey HSD test