Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 9;46(15):1059–1064. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091048

Table 4.

Risk Factor Rating (RFR): experts’ priorities of perceived key injury risk factor categories regarding their potential impact on injury risk

Perceived priority Potential key injury risk factor Mentions in RFR Rank Mean rank RFR Rank ∑ Rank points
1 System ski, plate, binding, boot 22 1 1.73 2 3
2 Changing snow conditions 17 2 1.79 4 6
3 Speed and course setting aspects 9 6 2.00 7 13
4 Physical aspects 6 9 1.92 6 15
4 Speed in general 11 4 2.23 11 15

6 Techniques of snow preparation 9 6 2.28 12 18
7 Aggressive snow conditions 8 8 2.31 13 21
7 Fatigue 15 3 2.83 18 21
7 Skiing technique and tactics 3 16 1.83 5 21
10 Athletes’ race preparation 2 20 1.75 3 23
10 Preinjury aspects 1 22 1.00 1 23
12 Bad visibility 3 16 2.00 8 24
12 Speed and topographic aspects 5 10 2.60 14 24
14 Jumps 11 4 3.45 24 28
15 Course setting in general 5 10 2.90 20 30
15 Gates (panels and poles) 5 10 2.90 20 30
17 Athletes’ individual responsibility 3 16 2.67 15 31
17 Psychological aspects 1 22 2.00 9 31
17 Racing suit 3 16 2.67 15 31
20 Binding/plate 5 10 3.00 22 32
20 Level of course difficulty 1 22 2.00 10 32
22 Safety net position and spill zone 4 14 2.88 19 33
23 Ski 4 14 3.13 23 37
23 Ski boot 2 20 2.75 17 37
25 Protectors and helmets 1 22 4.50 25 47

Mentions in RFR: number of subjects which mentioned a specific factor to have superior impact on injury risk (key risk factor). Mean rank RFR: mean value of the ranks given to a specific key risk factor by the experts. A low mean rank means high priority.