Table 4.
Perceived priority | Potential key injury risk factor | Mentions in RFR | Rank | Mean rank RFR | Rank | ∑ Rank points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | System ski, plate, binding, boot | 22 | 1 | 1.73 | 2 | 3 |
2 | Changing snow conditions | 17 | 2 | 1.79 | 4 | 6 |
3 | Speed and course setting aspects | 9 | 6 | 2.00 | 7 | 13 |
4 | Physical aspects | 6 | 9 | 1.92 | 6 | 15 |
4 | Speed in general | 11 | 4 | 2.23 | 11 | 15 |
| ||||||
6 | Techniques of snow preparation | 9 | 6 | 2.28 | 12 | 18 |
7 | Aggressive snow conditions | 8 | 8 | 2.31 | 13 | 21 |
7 | Fatigue | 15 | 3 | 2.83 | 18 | 21 |
7 | Skiing technique and tactics | 3 | 16 | 1.83 | 5 | 21 |
10 | Athletes’ race preparation | 2 | 20 | 1.75 | 3 | 23 |
10 | Preinjury aspects | 1 | 22 | 1.00 | 1 | 23 |
12 | Bad visibility | 3 | 16 | 2.00 | 8 | 24 |
12 | Speed and topographic aspects | 5 | 10 | 2.60 | 14 | 24 |
14 | Jumps | 11 | 4 | 3.45 | 24 | 28 |
15 | Course setting in general | 5 | 10 | 2.90 | 20 | 30 |
15 | Gates (panels and poles) | 5 | 10 | 2.90 | 20 | 30 |
17 | Athletes’ individual responsibility | 3 | 16 | 2.67 | 15 | 31 |
17 | Psychological aspects | 1 | 22 | 2.00 | 9 | 31 |
17 | Racing suit | 3 | 16 | 2.67 | 15 | 31 |
20 | Binding/plate | 5 | 10 | 3.00 | 22 | 32 |
20 | Level of course difficulty | 1 | 22 | 2.00 | 10 | 32 |
22 | Safety net position and spill zone | 4 | 14 | 2.88 | 19 | 33 |
23 | Ski | 4 | 14 | 3.13 | 23 | 37 |
23 | Ski boot | 2 | 20 | 2.75 | 17 | 37 |
25 | Protectors and helmets | 1 | 22 | 4.50 | 25 | 47 |
Mentions in RFR: number of subjects which mentioned a specific factor to have superior impact on injury risk (key risk factor). Mean rank RFR: mean value of the ranks given to a specific key risk factor by the experts. A low mean rank means high priority.