Table 3.
|
Cost Savings per Patient by Costing Methoda |
|
Population |
Cost Savings Due to Reduced Hospital LOS |
Cost Savings Due to Lower Infectious Complication Rates |
Base-case estimates |
|
|
Waitzberg et al.
[4]. |
$6,000 |
$3,300 |
ΔLOS = 2.18; ICR, 14.71% vs. 31.32% |
|
|
Estimates using lower LOS and infectious complication rates for the control populationb |
|
|
Upper + lower GI |
$3,200 |
$1,600 |
ΔLOS = 1.21; ICR, 5.2% vs. 11.2% |
|
|
Upper GI only |
$6,300 |
$4,300 |
ΔLOS = 1.78; ICR, 7.9% vs.17.1% |
|
|
Lower GI only |
$2,800 |
$1,200 |
ΔLOS = 1.14; ICR, 4.8% vs. 10.4% |
Abbreviations: Δ, absolute difference; GI gastrointestinal; HCUP Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project; ICR infectious complication rate for perioperative immunonutrition vs. standard nutrition; LOS length of stay.
a Rounded to the nearest $100.
b Infectious complication rates and length of stay for the control population taken from 2008 HCUP NIS values presented in Table 2 and relative risk of infectious complications and percentage reduction in length of stay presented in Table 1 and taken from Waitzberg et al. [4].