Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 26;7(11):e48232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048232

Figure 4. Qualitative evaluation of CUSP-MFM.

Figure 4

(a) One hundred synthetic tensors crossing at Inline graphic in various configurations. (b) Estimated tensors with a CUSP35 gradient encoding scheme (SNR = Inline graphicdB) superimposed on the first tensor's fraction Inline graphic (window: Inline graphic ; level Inline graphic). (c) Estimated tensors with the HARDI35 gradient encoding scheme. With a single non-zero b-value (Fig. c), the tensor eigenvalues and the fractions are collinear, leading to a poor multi-fascicle estimate. When using CUSP35 (Fig. b), the system is better determined, leading to a better estimate. Both the tensors and the fraction Inline graphic are more uniform when using CUSP35-MFM compared to HARDI35-MFM.