Table 2.
ROC analysis of the SAPAS-AV and subgroup comparison of AUC
Sample | AUC (95% CI) | Standard error |
Comparison of AUC difference |
---|---|---|---|
p1 | |||
Whole sample at baseline (N = 80) |
0.89**** (0.80 to 0.95) |
0.04 |
0.74 |
Whole sample at follow-up (N = 80) |
0.90**** (0.81 to 0.96) |
0.03 |
|
Group 1 (n = 40) |
0.89**** (0.75 to 0.97) |
0.06 |
0.93 |
Group 2 (n = 40) |
0.89**** (0.75 to 0.96) |
0.05 |
|
Site 1 (n = 34) |
0.86**** (0.70 to 0.96) |
0.07 |
0.47 |
Site 2 (n = 38) | 0.92**** (0.78 to 0.98) | 0.05 |
Note. ****AUC is significantly different from the non-informative line (AUC = 0.50) at the level of p < 0.0001. 1Two-tailed z-test comparing differences between AUC for the two ROC-curves.