Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 30;12:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-94

Table 2.

ROC analysis of the SAPAS-AV and subgroup comparison of AUC

Sample AUC (95% CI) Standard error Comparison of AUC difference
p1
Whole sample at baseline (N = 80)
0.89**** (0.80 to 0.95)
0.04
0.74
Whole sample at follow-up (N = 80)
0.90**** (0.81 to 0.96)
0.03
Group 1 (n = 40)
0.89**** (0.75 to 0.97)
0.06
0.93
Group 2 (n = 40)
0.89**** (0.75 to 0.96)
0.05
Site 1 (n = 34)
0.86**** (0.70 to 0.96)
0.07
0.47
Site 2 (n = 38) 0.92**** (0.78 to 0.98) 0.05

Note. ****AUC is significantly different from the non-informative line (AUC = 0.50) at the level of p < 0.0001. 1Two-tailed z-test comparing differences between AUC for the two ROC-curves.