Table 5. Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) for NRY haplotype data, using the ΦST measure (upper) and classical FST (lower).
Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | % variation | Fixation index | p-valuea |
Among groups | 5 | 129.901 | 0.660 | 4.88 | 0.048 | 0.002 |
Among populations within groups | 4 | 37.769 | −0.300 | −2.22 | −0.023 | 0.834 |
Within populations | 174 | 2291.086 | 13.167 | 97.34 | 0.026 | 0.041 |
Total | 183 | 2458.755 | 13.526 | |||
Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | % variation | Fixation index | p-value a |
Among groups | 5 | 31.244 | 0.114 | 3.05 | 0.030 | 0.004 |
Among populations within groups | 4 | 12.909 | −0.037 | −0.99 | −0.010 | 0.858 |
Within populations | 174 | 641.857 | 3.689 | 97.94 | 0.020 | 0.006 |
Total | 183 | 686.011 | 3.766 |
Significance tests were performed with 10,100 permutations.
The genetic structure tested consisted of six groups inferred with the SAMOVA approach. 1: Aviles; 2: Nalon-Caudal-SouthOviedo; 3: EoNavia; 4: Narcea; 5: Oriente: 6: Gijon-EastOviedo-CentralOviedo.