Table 1.
Household possession and use of insecticide-treated nets in intervention and comparison regions in December 2009*
| |
Proportion of households possessing at least one ITN |
Proportion of children < 5 years sleeping under an ITN |
Proportion of the total population sleeping under an ITN |
|---|---|---|---|
| % (95% CI) | % (95% CI) | % (95% CI) | |
| Intervention regions | |||
| Fatick |
96.7 (94.9-98.4) |
60.2 (40.2-80.1) |
52.2 (37.4 – 67.1) |
| Kaffrine |
89.9 (84.3-95.5) |
46.5 (23.3-69.7) |
37.5 (17.0-58.1) |
| Kaolack |
95.4 (93.0-97.9) |
44.5 (32.4-56.7) |
33.8 (23.5-44.0) |
| Kédougou |
87.0 (82.4-91.6) |
41.1 (27.9-54.3) |
30.4 (22.9-37.9) |
| Matam |
84.0 (77.8-90.3) |
58.6 (46.1-71.2) |
45.8 (36.7-54.9) |
| Tambacounda |
86.6 (82.3-91.0) |
37.1 (26.8-47.5) |
26.1 (19.5 – 32.7) |
| Comparison regions | |||
| Kolda |
89.2 (84.3-94.1) |
70.8 (63.0-78.5) |
60.6 (56.1-65.1) |
| Sédhiou | 90.2 (86.1-94.3) | 66.2 (53.2-79.2) | 53.0 (42.4-63.7) |
*Regional level data from post-ITN distribution campaign survey in December 2009 [23].