Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 27;7(11):e50647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050647

Table 1. Demographic and clinical information of participants.

Normal Control Problem Gamblers Pathological Gamblers Test Statistics Bonferroni-corrected Pairwise Comparison
n 35 38 27
Age (SD) 44.14(11.01) 38.46(15.42) 40.15(10.15) F(2,97) = 1.88, p = .16 CONT = PG = PrG
Male/Female 28/7 28/10 21/6 X2(2,98) = 0.42, p = .81 CONT = PG = PrG
Employed full time % (n) 74.3(26) 71.05(27) 70.37(19) X2(2,98) = 0.14, p = .93 CONT = PrG
Education% (n)
<12th grade 34.3(12) 39.4(15) 40.7(11) X2(2,98) = .33, p = .85 CONT = PrG
12th grade or higher 65.7(23) 60.6(23) 59.3(16)
WAIS VOC 44.61(6.30) 45.60(6.15) 43.29(7.34) F(2, 98) = 0.94, p = .39 CONT = PG = PrG
WAIS BLOC REP 15.51(1.89) 14.40(2.46) 14.18(2.88) F(2, 98) = 1.71, p = .19 CONT = PG = PrG
WAIS BLOC TR 19.30(5.59) 21.24(6.92) 22.66(6.87) F(2, 98) = 1.67, p = .27 CONT = PG = PrG
ADHD 7.61(3.31) 13.58(5.91) 12.52(3.79) F(2, 97) = 15.23, p<.001 CONT<PG, PrG
BDI 2.29(2.47) 6.18(5.10) 10.44(6.02) F(2, 98) = 31.63, p<.001 CONT<PrG<PG
STAI-S 30.29(9.96) 39.24(13.76) 43.78(13.72) F(2, 98) = 8.23, p<.001 CONT<PrG, PG
STAI-T 36.64(7.31) 45.50(9.64) 49.73(9.53) F(2, 98) = 17.76, p<.001 CONT<PrG, PG
SOGS 0.00(0.00) 4.69(2.88) 9.78(3.67) t(65) = 6.39, p<.001 PrG<PG
Duration of gambling practice (in years) / 17.53(12.87) 15.11(11.60) t(65) = .65, p = .51 PrG = PG

Values shown are the mean and standard deviations on each measure. The South Oaks Gambling Screen was administered only in the PG and PrG groups. Degrees of freedom differ due to missing data. WAIS VOC = WAIS vocabulary, WAIS BLOC REP = WAIS block design correct responses, WAIS BLOC TR = WAIS bloc design reaction time, ADHD = attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, BDI = Beck Depression Inventory, STAI-S = State version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI-T = Trait version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, SOGS = South Oaks Gambling Screen.