Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 16;12:253. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-253

Table 2.

Framework for quality assessment of HEE quality appraisal instruments

Dimension Item
A. Purpose and scope
A1. The reasons for developing the guideline are stated
 
A2. The overall objective of the guideline is described
 
A3. The health economic studies for which the guideline was designed are stated
 
A4. The target audience of the guideline is characterized
 
A5. The time frame to which the guideline is meant to apply is specified
B. Stakeholder involvement
B1. The guideline development group consists of individuals from all relevant disciplines
 
B2. Conflicts of interest of guideline development group members have been recorded and addressed
 
B3. The views and preferences of the target audience have been sought
C. Rigor of development process/validity
C1. The members of the guideline development group and their affiliations are stated
 
C2. The methods used for literature search are specified
 
C3. The sources of evidence on which the guideline is based are described
 
C4. The criteria for selecting existing evidence are described
 
C5. The methods for formulating the items are specified
 
C6. The methods used to reach consensus are specified
 
C7. The date for reviewing/updating the guideline is stated
 
C8. The guideline is valid in terms of:
 
C8a. Content (internal) validity
 
C8b. Criterion (external) validity
 
C8c. Construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity)
D. Reliability/ reproducibility
D1. The process of guideline development is documented
 
D2. The guideline has been externally reviewed by experts prior to its publication
 
D3. The guideline has been piloted/pretested among the target audience
 
D4. The guideline is reliable in terms of:
 
D4a. Inter-rater reliability
 
D4b. Test-retest reliability
 
D4c. Parallel-forms reliability
 
D4d. Internal consistency reliability
E. Clarity of presentation
E1. The items of the guideline are specific and clearly worded
 
E2. The items of the guideline are clearly presented and user friendly
 
E3. The guideline can be used in a straightforward manner
 
E4. Key items are easily identifiable
F. Applicability
F1. The guideline provides a standard reporting format
 
F2. The guideline gives a detailed assessment instruction
 
F3. The guideline presents items of methodological quality and transparency
 
F4. The guideline uses a quality score
 
F5. The strengths and limitations of the guideline are specified
G. Evaluation
G1. The methods for evaluating the guideline are described
  G2. The adherence to the guideline by the target audience is described