Table 5.
Matched pair analysis of composite scores for Intervention group before and after intervention for intervention group (n=18)
| Participant number | Composite score after intervention | Composite Score before interv. | Difference | Negative/Positive Gain | Magnitude of gain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 164 |
63 |
50 |
+13 |
Pos |
Significant |
| 093 |
70 |
65 |
+15 |
Pos |
Significant |
| 112 |
70 |
58 |
+12 |
Pos |
Significant |
| 150 |
70 |
58 |
+12 |
Pos |
Significant |
| 183 |
85 |
70 |
+12 |
Pos |
Significant |
| 136 |
89 |
68 |
+13 |
Pos |
Significant |
| 158 |
89 |
63 |
+13 |
Pos |
Significant |
| 184 |
89 |
60 |
+29 |
Pos |
Very sig |
| 191 |
89 |
60 |
+29 |
Pos |
Very sig |
| 179 |
93 |
68 |
+25 |
Pos |
Very sig |
| 083 |
96 |
70 |
+26 |
Pos |
Very sig |
| 157 |
96 |
58 |
+38 |
Pos |
Very sig |
| 198 |
96 |
40 |
+56 |
Pos |
Very sig |
| 063 |
100 |
58 |
+42 |
Pos |
Very sig |
| 202 |
100 |
50 |
+50 |
Pos |
Very sig |
| 096 |
81 |
68 |
+13 |
Pos |
Significant |
| 135 |
85 |
63 |
+22 |
Pos |
Very Sig |
| 070 | 63 | 65 | −2 | Neg | Minimal |