Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 22;13:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-89

Table 6.

Comparisons of the haplotype diversity of GSTM cluster in populations of Tver, Murom, Kursk and HapMap populations (CEU, CHB, JPT, YRI) *

  MUROM KURSK СЕU CHB JPT YRI Number of haploblock The level of significance
TVER
0,5078
0,5183
0,2862
0,0021
<0,0001
0,4485
I
0,0025
 
0,3202
0,8943
0,2160
<0,0001
<0,0001
<0,0001
II
0,0019
 
0,9120
0,9206
0,7647
<0,0001
<0,0001
<0,0001
III
0,0025
MUROM
 
0,6541
0,3994
0,0027
<0,0001
0,5856
I
0,0025
 
 
0,4052
0,1369
<0,0001
<0,0001
<0,0001
II
0,0019
 
 
0,9392
0,5527
<0,0001
<0,0001
<0,0001
III
0,0025
KURSK
 
 
0,0811
0,0313
0,0018
0,1701
I
0,0025
 
 
 
0,0906
<0,0001
<0,0001
<0,0001
II
0,0019
      0,8592 <0,0001 <0,0001 <0,0001 III 0,0025

* Pairwise P-values are presented. The last column contains Bonferroni adjusted P-values calculated for each block. The calculations was performed using the formula P = 0.05/ ([n × a] – 1), where “n” is the number of haplotypes and “a” is the number of populations [16].