Table 2.
Functional results
Authors | Implant | Number of hips | Functional score | Preoperative | Postoperative |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amstutz et al. [10] | Conserve plus | 1107 | UCLA | 48 | 86.5 |
Aulakh et al. [11] | BHR | 202 | HHS | 62 ON vs 58 OA | 96 ON vs 95.8 OA |
Baker et al. [8] | BHR | 108 | OXFORD | ||
Beaulé et al. [12] | Conserve plus | 116 | HHS | 53.1 | 90.1 |
Bergeron et al. [13] | ASR | 228 | HHS | 46.6 | 91 |
Bose et al. [14] | BHR | 96 | UCLA | NR | 68.6 |
Carrothers et al. [15] | BHR | 5000 | HHS | NR | 96 |
Costa et al. [16] | Cormet | 73 | NR | NR | NR |
Daniel et al. [17] | McMinn and BHR | 446 | OXFORD | NR | 77.5 |
Daniel et al. [18] | McMinn 2nd generation | 184 | OXFORD | NR | 68.3 |
De Smet et al. [19] | BHR | 252 | HHS | NR | 97.2 |
De Steiger et al. [9] | ASR | 1167 | NR | NR | NR |
Della Valle et al. [20] | BHR | 537 | NR | NR | NR |
Delport et al. [21] | BHR and Recap | 56 | HHS | 45 | 96.3 |
Fowble et al. [22] | Conserve plus | 50 | HHS | 45 | 97 |
Giannini et al. [23] | BHR | 350 | HHS | 57 | 98.6 |
Gravius et al. [24] | Durom | 82 | HHS | 40.1 | 94.6 |
Gross et al. [25] | Cormet | 373 | HHS | 57 | 96 |
Heilpern et al. [26] | BHR | 113 | HHS | NR | 96.4 |
Hing et al. [27] | BHR | 230 | HHS | 62.2 | 95.2 |
Hulst et al. [28] | Conserve plus | 643 | NR | NR | NR |
Jameson et al. [29] | ASR | 214 | HHS | 51.3 | 94.5 |
Khan et al. [30] | BHR | 679 | HHS | 47 | 95 |
Killampalli et al. [31] | Cormet | 100 | OXFORD | 37.5 | 89.6 |
Kim et al. [32] | Conserve plus | 200 | HHS | 55.8 | 92.1 |
Klein et al. [33] | ASR | 115 | HHS | 59 | 96 |
Langton et al. [34] | BHR and ASR | 660 | HHS | NR | 94 ASR vs 97 BHR vs 76 ASR THA |
Larbpaiboonpong et al. [35] | BHR | 40 | HHS | 35.1 | 96.4 |
Lei et al. [36] | Durom | 90 | HHS | 57 | 93 |
Mackenzie et al. [37] | BHR | 499 | WOMAC | 49.9 BHR vs 42.3 THA | 91.9 BHR vs 87.1 THA |
Madadi et al. [38] | Cormet | 52 | HHS | NR | 96 |
Madhu et al. [39] | BHR | 117 | HHS | NR | 84.4 |
Malhotra et al. [40] | ASR | 32 | HHS | 39.6 | 88.4 |
Marker et al. [41] | Conserve plus | 361 | NR | NR | NR |
Marulanda et al. [42] | BHR | 230 | OXFORD | 27 | 78 |
McAndrew et al. [43] | BHR | 180 | HHS | 44 | 72 |
McBryde [44] | BHR | 2123 | NR | NR | NR |
McMinn et al. [45] | BHR | 3095 | OXFORD | NR | 97.9 (13) |
Mont et al. [46] | Conserve plus | 54 | HHS | 52 | 90 |
Mont et al. [47] | Conserve plus | 1016 | HHS | NR | 93.1 |
Naal et al. [48] | Durom | 100 | HHS | NR | 94.7 |
Ollivere et al. [49] | BHR | 463 | HHS | NR | NR |
Sandiford et al. [50] | BHR | 141 | HHS | 54.1 HR vs 46.4 THA | 96.8 HR vs 95.8 THA |
Siebel et al. [51] | ASR | 300 | HHS | 44 | 89 |
Smolders et al. [52] | Conserve plus | 38 | UCLA | NR | 80 HR vs 70 THA |
Steffen et al. [53] | BHR | 610 | HHS | NR | 93.1 |
Stulberg et al. [54] | Cormet | 337 | HHS | 50.1 | 96.7 |
Swank and Alkire [55] | BHR | 128 | HHS | 49 | 96 |
Takamura et al. [56] | Conserve plus | 500 | UCLA | ||
Treacy et al. [57] | BHR | 2123 | OXFORD | 34.5 | 95.8 |
Vendittoli et al. [58] | Durom | 109 | WOMAC | 45.1 | 90.6 |
Wang et al. [59] | Conserve plus | 37 | HHS | 35.4 HR vs 35.9 THA | 94.5 HR vs 95.1 THA |
Witzleb et al. [60] | BHR | 300 | HHS | 51 | 96 |
UCLA UCLA activity score, HHS Harris hip score, OXFORD Oxford hip score, NR not reported, WOMAC Western Ontario McMaster osteo-arthritis index