Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 26;36(12):2399–2410. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1686-3

Table 2.

Functional results 

Authors Implant Number of hips Functional score Preoperative Postoperative
Amstutz et al. [10] Conserve plus 1107 UCLA 48 86.5
Aulakh et al. [11] BHR 202 HHS 62 ON vs 58 OA 96 ON vs 95.8 OA
Baker et al. [8] BHR 108 OXFORD
Beaulé et al. [12] Conserve plus 116 HHS 53.1 90.1
Bergeron et al. [13] ASR 228 HHS 46.6 91
Bose et al. [14] BHR 96 UCLA NR 68.6
Carrothers et al. [15] BHR 5000 HHS NR 96
Costa et al. [16] Cormet 73 NR NR NR
Daniel et al. [17] McMinn and BHR 446 OXFORD NR 77.5
Daniel et al. [18] McMinn 2nd generation 184 OXFORD NR 68.3
De Smet et al. [19] BHR 252 HHS NR 97.2
De Steiger et al. [9] ASR 1167 NR NR NR
Della Valle et al. [20] BHR 537 NR NR NR
Delport et al. [21] BHR and Recap 56 HHS 45 96.3
Fowble et al. [22] Conserve plus 50 HHS 45 97
Giannini et al. [23] BHR 350 HHS 57 98.6
Gravius et al. [24] Durom 82 HHS 40.1 94.6
Gross et al. [25] Cormet 373 HHS 57 96
Heilpern et al. [26] BHR 113 HHS NR 96.4
Hing et al. [27] BHR 230 HHS 62.2 95.2
Hulst et al. [28] Conserve plus 643 NR NR NR
Jameson et al. [29] ASR 214 HHS 51.3 94.5
Khan et al. [30] BHR 679 HHS 47 95
Killampalli et al. [31] Cormet 100 OXFORD 37.5 89.6
Kim et al. [32] Conserve plus 200 HHS 55.8 92.1
Klein et al. [33] ASR 115 HHS 59 96
Langton et al. [34] BHR and ASR 660 HHS NR 94 ASR vs 97 BHR vs 76 ASR THA
Larbpaiboonpong et al. [35] BHR 40 HHS 35.1 96.4
Lei et al. [36] Durom 90 HHS 57 93
Mackenzie et al. [37] BHR 499 WOMAC 49.9 BHR vs 42.3 THA 91.9 BHR vs 87.1 THA
Madadi et al. [38] Cormet 52 HHS NR 96
Madhu et al. [39] BHR 117 HHS NR 84.4
Malhotra et al. [40] ASR 32 HHS 39.6 88.4
Marker et al. [41] Conserve plus 361 NR NR NR
Marulanda et al. [42] BHR 230 OXFORD 27 78
McAndrew et al. [43] BHR 180 HHS 44 72
McBryde [44] BHR 2123 NR NR NR
McMinn et al. [45] BHR 3095 OXFORD NR 97.9 (13)
Mont et al. [46] Conserve plus 54 HHS 52 90
Mont et al. [47] Conserve plus 1016 HHS NR 93.1
Naal et al. [48] Durom 100 HHS NR 94.7
Ollivere et al. [49] BHR 463 HHS NR NR
Sandiford et al. [50] BHR 141 HHS 54.1 HR vs 46.4 THA 96.8 HR vs 95.8 THA
Siebel et al. [51] ASR 300 HHS 44 89
Smolders et al. [52] Conserve plus 38 UCLA NR 80 HR vs 70 THA
Steffen et al. [53] BHR 610 HHS NR 93.1
Stulberg et al. [54] Cormet 337 HHS 50.1 96.7
Swank and Alkire [55] BHR 128 HHS 49 96
Takamura et al. [56] Conserve plus 500 UCLA
Treacy et al. [57] BHR 2123 OXFORD 34.5 95.8
Vendittoli et al. [58] Durom 109 WOMAC 45.1 90.6
Wang et al. [59] Conserve plus 37 HHS 35.4 HR vs 35.9 THA 94.5 HR vs 95.1 THA
Witzleb et al. [60] BHR 300 HHS 51 96

UCLA UCLA activity score, HHS Harris hip score, OXFORD Oxford hip score, NR not reported, WOMAC Western Ontario McMaster osteo-arthritis index