Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Inorg Chem. 2012 Sep 30;17(8):1241–1255. doi: 10.1007/s00775-012-0939-3

Table 1.

Full extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) least-squares fitting results for diferrous and diferric MauG

Coordination R (Å)a σ22)b
Diferrous MauG
 4.5 Fe–N/O 2.00 290
 8 Fe–C 2.97 328
 8 Fe–C/N 3.03 /328c
 8 Fe–C/N 3.18 /328c
 4 Fe–N 3.38 275
 8 Fe–C/N 4.04 664
 16 Fe–C/N–N/C 4.31 /664c
Diferric MauG
 0.5 Fe–N/O 1.89 269
 5 Fe–N/O 2.00 202
 8 Fe–C 2.89 252
 8 Fe–C 3.04 /252c
 8 Fe–C 3.24 /252c
 4 Fe–N 3.37 309
 8 Fe–C/N 4.28 262
 16 Fe–C/N–N/C 4.33 /262c

Error (F) is given by Σ[(χobsdχcalcd)2k6]/Σ[(χobsd)2k6] (diferrous MauG F = 0.39, E0 = 3.23, diferric MauG: F = 0.39, E0 = −1.86)

a

The estimated standard deviations for the distances are on the order of ±0.02 Å

b

The σ2 values are multiplied by 105

c

The slash before a parameter indicates that it is linked to the same parameter as its parent single-scattering path