Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Inorg Chem. 2012 Sep 30;17(8):1241–1255. doi: 10.1007/s00775-012-0939-3

Table 3.

First-shell EXAFS least-squares fitting results for bisFe(IV) MauG

First-shell optimization
Final fit
Na R (Å)b σ22)c E0 Fd Na R (Å)b σ22)c E0 Fd
Fit 1 5e 2.00 370 8.6 0.72 0.5 1.69 268 7.64 0.55
0.5 1.86 116
Fit 2 4.5 2.00 338 9.1 0.63 5 2.00 307
8 2.89 287
Fit 3 0.5 1.70 760 8.2 0.57 8 3.04 /287f
5 1.99 370 8 3.15 /287f
Fit 4 0.5 1.70 1,340 8.8 0.56 4 3.41 323
4.5 1.99 320 8 4.10 377
Fit 5 0.5 1.69 268 7.64 0.55 16 4.33 /377f
0.5 1.86 116
5 2.00 307
a

Coordination number

b

The estimated standard deviations for the distances are on the order of ± 0.02 Å

c

The σ2 values are multiplied by 105

d

Error (F) is given by Σ[(χobsdχcalcd)2k6]/Σ[(χobsd)2k6]

e

Higher coordination numbers resulted in significantly worse fits

f

The slash before a parameter indicates that it is linked to the same parameter as its parent single-scattering path