Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 28;64:277–283. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.057

Table 1.

Correlations between: SUV during the alcohol scan and self-reports of “Intoxication” (all subjects); SUV for placebo and SUV for alcohol scans and the alcohol doses used (number of beers consumed per day) in the Heavy Drinkers (HD); and percent change in SUV (with respect to placebo) and alcohol doses used in HD.

SUV Alcohol
vs “Intoxication” All Subjects
SUV Placebo
vs Doses Used
HD
SUV Alcohol
vs Doses Used
HD
% Change SUV
vs Doses Used
HD
Frontal R=−0.46, p=0.009 R=0.68, p=0.005 R=0.54, p=0.04 R=0.65, p<0.02
Parietal R=−0.41, p=0.02 R=0.53, p=0.05 R=0.49, NS R=0.51, p<0.08
Temporal R=−0.49, p=0.006* R=0.66, p=0.007 R=0.53, p=0.007 R=065, p<0.02
Occipital R=−0.46, p=0.009 R=0.60, p-0.02 R=0.60, p-0.04 R=0.62, p<0.03
Striatum R=−0.49, p=0.005* R=0.63, p=0.02 R=0.51, NS R=0.64, p<0.02
Thalamus R=−0.33, p=0.07 R=0.65, p=0.01 R=0.64, p=0.01 R=0.55, p<0.06
Cerebellum R=−0.40, p=0.03 R=0.54, p=0.04 R=0.39, NS R=0.66, p<0.01
*

Significant after Bonferroni correction P <0.006 for exploratory analysis