Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Graph Model. 2012 Oct 13;38:430–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2012.10.001

Table 2.

Comparison of calculated with experimental Binding free energies of FDA approved HIV-PR inhibitors and some of the nano-material based HIV-PR inhibitors.

Name WT I50V V82A I84V
Theory Expt. Theory Expt. Theory Expt. Theory Expt.
SWCNT(3,3) −70.85 - −64.88 - −56.65 - −48.22 -
SWCNT(5,5) −120.55(±29.26)r - - - - - - -
Fullerene C60 −1.25p 8−11q
Darunavir −15.33a −15.20i −10.88a −11.90f −12.20c −11.66c
Amprenavir −9.83
−20.02h
−15.10
−13.20k −12.6d −11.4e −14.0d −12.3e
Saquinavir −11.37 −14.24j
Indinavir −11.29 −13.24l 0.79b
Nelfinavir −11.18 −12.34m
Lopinavir −12.69 −14.30o
Ritonavir −11.51 −14.84n
Tipranavir −11.49 −14.60o
Atazanavir −27.77g −14.30o −18.52g

All values are given in kcal/mol.

a

Meher et al. [39];

b

Mahalingam et al. [42];

c

Tie et al. [40];

d

Kar & Knecht [43];

e

Shen et al. [44];

f

Kovalevsky et al. [22];

g

Alcaro et al.[45];

h

Ref[46];

I

Ref.[47];

j

Ref.[48];

k

Ref.[49];

l

Ref. [50];

m

Ref. [51];

n

Ref. [52];

o

Ref. [53];

p

Ref. [20];

q

Ref. [3];

r

Ref. [19]