Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Aug 6;23(1):73–77. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1527-8

Table 2.

Puborectal muscle status among groups

Controls (n=24) Cases (n=24) p value
Puborectal muscle avulsion 0% (0) 0% (0) 1.0
Puborectal muscle bulk
 Thin 42% (10) 25% (6)
 Average 42% (10) 38% (9)
 Thick 17% (4) 38% (9) 0.47a

Values reported as % (n)

a

Chi-square