Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 13;14(12):1407–1417. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts027

Table 4.

.Perceived Negative Consequences of Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services Regulation: Clinical Supervisors

Category N % n % Sample comment
Addict behaviors 32 34.4
    Sneakiness 19 20.4 “Client and staff have been forced to engage in sneaky behaviors”
“Encourages clients to lie which is absolutely not a good thing in terms of their recovery on life in general”
 Unauthorized smoking 9 9.7 “More smoking indoors”
“The clients will now go to unauthorized areas”
    Underground economy 4 4.3 “The regulation has created an underground economy around tobacco use”
Enforcement problems 16 17.2
    Difficulty enforcing/penalizing 10 10.8 “Not enough staff to monitor violations”
“Uneven enforcement”
    Policing/time lost 6 6.5 “Employees spend quite a bit of time policing the grounds”
Reduces patient census 13 14.0
    Fewer patients seeking treatment 6 6.5 “Some clients won’t come into treatments inpatient because they can’t smoke”
    Voluntarily leaving treatment 4 4.3 “Many patients have been unable to tolerate a smoke free environment and have left AMA [Against Medical Advice]”
    Involuntary discharge 3 3.2 “Clients were being discharged for smoking when they still need treatment”
Negative attitudes 11 11.8
    Negative emotional reactions 8 8.6 “Staff and client morale has decreased”
    Stigmatization of smokers 3 3.2 “Shame-more-shame”
Compromises treatment goals 9 9.7
    Interferes with drug treatment 6 6.5 “Client success rates have declined significantly”
    Resistance to treatment 3 3.2 “We have more resistance in the program”
Negative patient behavior 8 8.6
    Acting out 8 8.6 “Dealing with ‘acting out’ behaviors”
Miscellaneous 4 4.3 “Fires have started”

Note. Total N = 93. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.