Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb;294(2):R321–R328. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00230.2007

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Percent change in cumulative foraging from sham EWATx + sham IWATx for each lipectomy condition (see Fig. 1 legend) in 10Revs group. Cumulative foraging of sham EWATx + sham IWATx in 10Revs group (3,788 ± 110) is given. Values are means ± SE.