Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 10;9(10):3540–3574. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9103540

Table 4.

Quantitative distribution of statistical analyses and type of association (positive (+), negative (–) or null (#)) according to socioeconomic indicators.

Socioeconomic indicator Multivariate analysis: Socioeconomic indicator and dental cariesOR (95%CI) or Beta or R2 or RR
Type of association * + (95% CI does not include 1.0 or p < 0.05) − (95% CI does not include 1.0 or p < 0.05) # (95% CI includes 1.0 or p > 0.05)
SCHOOLING
Schooling Subject’s
Tervonen et al., 1991 [31] OR = 1.12 (1.03–1.20)
Sgan-Cohen et al., 1999 [37] R = −0.16 (p < 0.001)
Hahn et al., 1999 [64] (p > 0.05)
Unell et al., 1999 [38] (p < 0.05)
Brodeur et al., 2000 [40] OR = 1.2 (0.79–1.81)
Sgan-Cohen et al., 2000 [43] (p < 0.001)
Varenne et al., 2006 [49] OR = 2.99 (p < 0.05)
Geyer et al., 2010 [16] OR = 2.95 (1.52–5.74)
Brennan et al., 2011 [18] Β = −0.25 (p < 0.01)
Schooling Father’s
Julihn et al., 2006 [48] (p > 0.05)
SUBJECT’S INCOME
Brodeur et al., 2000 [40] OR = 3.8 (2.19–6.48)
Gilbert et al., 2001 [59] OR = 2.5 (p < 0.05)
Brennan et al., 2007 [50] (p < 0.001)
Skudutyte-Rysstad et al., 2009 [54] OR = 4.5 (1.9–10.2)
Brennan et al., 2010 [17] (p < 0.01)
Geyer et al., 2010 [16] OR = 2.34 (1.00–5.55)
Brennan et al., 2011 [18] Beta = −0.27 (p < 0.001)
OCCUPATION/JOB
Occupation/Subject’s job
Unell et al., 1999 [38] (p < 0.05)
Varenne et al., 2006 [49] OR = 5.26 (p < 0.05)
Roberts-Thomson et al., 2008 [52] (p < 0.05)
Occupation/Father’s job
Julihn et al., 2006 [48] (p > 0.05)
Occupation/Mother’s job
Julihn et al., 2006 [48] (p > 0.05)
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS-SES
SES Subject’s (p > 0.05)
Marcenes & Sheiham, 1992 [32] R2 = 0.35
Berset et al., 1996 [34] OR = 6.06 (2.06–17.87)
Geyer et al., 2010 [16]
Shearer et al., 2012 [61] RR = 1.15 (0.95–1.40)
Subject’s SES trajectory
Thomson et al., 2004 [58] (p < 0.05)
SOCIAL INDEX-Gini
Celeste et al., 2009 [53] OR = 2.49 (2.30–2.68)
Celeste et al., 2011 [55] (p < 0.05)

* (+) worse socioeconomic indicator significantly associated to higher severity of dental caries, (−) worse socioeconomic indicator significantly associated to lower severity of dental caries negative association, (#) no significantly association between socioeconomic indicator and dental caries.