Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Apr 10;7(4):931–948. doi: 10.1021/ct100684s

Table 2.

Parameter Sets for the Different DFTB Variants

variant seta ζ b UCd c UHd c UNd c UOd c UPd c USd c
DFTB2 - - - - - - -
DFTB2-γh calc 3.70d - - - - - -
DFTB3-γ calc - −0.1492 −0.1857 −0.1535 −0.1575 −0.0702 −0.0695
DFTB3-diag calc 4.53 −0.1492 −0.1857 −0.1535 −0.1575 −0.0702 −0.0695
DFTB3-diag fit 5.0 −0.04 −0.14 −0.11 −0.17 −0.07 -
DFTB3 calc 4.05 −0.1492 −0.1857 −0.1535 −0.1575 −0.0702 −0.0695
DFTB3 fit 4.2 −0.23 −0.16 −0.13 −0.19 −0.14 -
a

“calc” stands for calculated Hubbard derivatives Ud and/or ζ fitted to the water dimer; “fit” for a set of parameters fitted to a large set of binding energies and proton affinities. For details see text.

b

ζ is the unitless parameter as defined in eq 21

c

UXd=UXnXnX0 is the Hubbard derivative with respect to the occupation number of the highest occupied atomic orbital nX of atom type X in atomic units. In our third order formalism we define UXqXqX0=UXnXnX0

d

Note that ζ is fitted to yield a binding energy for the water dimer of −4.9 kcal/mol in contrast to ζ = 4.5 as reported in ref39 for DFTB2-γh where ζ was fitted to minimize the error of 22 selected binding energies.