Table 2.
Results of primer screening in three Abies pinsapo populations.
Sierra de las Nieves (N = 10) | Grazalema (N = 10) | Sierra Bermeja (N = 10) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Locus | A | Ho | He | HWE | An | A | Ho | He | HWE | An | A | Ho | He | HWE | An |
Pin8 | 2 | 0.400 | 0.442 | 0.880 | 0.024 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.479 | 0.014 | 0.640 | 3 | 0.500 | 0.416 | 0.774 | 0.000 |
Pin14 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - |
Pin17 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | 2 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 0.868 | 0.000 |
Pin20 | 3 | 0.300 | 0.416 | 0.667 | 0.128 | 2 | 0.000 | 0.189 | 0.002 | 0.907 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - |
Pin22 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - |
Pin25 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - |
Pin29 | 2 | 0.400 | 0.442 | 0.880 | 0.024 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.479 | 0.014 | 0.640 | 2 | 0.500 | 0.395 | 0.292 | 0.000 |
Pin32 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | 2 | 0.200 | 0.442 | 0.098 | 0.355 |
Pin44 | 2 | 0.600 | 0.505 | 0.429 | 0.000 | 2 | 0.400 | 0.337 | 0.429 | 0.000 | 2 | 0.400 | 0.526 | 0.527 | 0.111 |
Pin48 | 4 | 0.400 | 0.600 | 0.640 | 0.192 | 3 | 0.500 | 0.542 | 0.179 | 0.000 | 4 | 0.500 | 0.432 | 0.981 | 0.000 |
Pin49 | 2 | 0.300 | 0.479 | 0.281 | 0.205 | 2 | 0.500 | 0.521 | 0.975 | 0.000 | 2 | 0.400 | 0.337 | 0.429 | 0.000 |
Pin52 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 0.868 | 0.000 | 2 | 0.200 | 0.189 | 0.725 | 0.000 | 2 | 0.200 | 0.442 | 0.098 | 0.355 |
Note: N = simple size; A = number of alleles; Ho = observed heterozygosity; He = expected heterozygosity; An = null allele frequency; HWE = Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test (p-values).