Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 29;8(11):e1002771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002771

Figure 2. Time interval reproduction task and generative model.

Figure 2

Top: Outline of a trial. Participants clicked on a mouse button and a yellow dot was flashed Inline graphic ms later at the center of the screen, with Inline graphic drawn from a block-dependent distribution (estimation phase). The subject then pressed the mouse button for a matching duration of Inline graphic ms (reproduction phase). Performance feedback was then displayed according to an error map Inline graphic. Bottom: Generative model for the time interval reproduction task. The interval Inline graphic is drawn from the probability distribution Inline graphic (the objective distribution). The stimulus induces in the observer the noisy sensory measurement Inline graphic with conditional probability density Inline graphic (the sensory likelihood), with Inline graphic a sensory variability parameter. The action Inline graphic subsequently taken by the ideal observer is assumed to be the ‘optimal’ action Inline graphic that minimizes the subjectively expected loss (Eq. 1); Inline graphic is therefore a deterministic function of Inline graphic, Inline graphic. The subjectively expected loss depends on terms such as the prior Inline graphic and the loss function (squared subjective error map Inline graphic), which do not necessarily match their objective counterparts. The chosen action is then corrupted by motor noise, producing the observed response Inline graphic with conditional probability density Inline graphic (the motor likelihood), where Inline graphic is a motor variability parameter.