Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 30;18(7):680–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03784.x

Table 3.

Global success rates over the course of the study according to baseline APACHE II score, treatment strategy and septic shock status in modified intent-to-treat patients at the end of intravenous therapy (EOIVT), end of therapy (EOT), 2 weeks post-EOT and 6 weeks post-EOT

EOIVT EOT 2 weeks post-EOT 6 weeks post-EOT
APACHE II ≤20a
n (%) 84/119 (70.6%) 80/116 (69.0%) 60/98 (61.2%) 44/84 (52.4%)
  95% CI 61.5–78.6% 59.7–77.2% 50.8–70.9% 41.2–63.4%
APACHE II >20a
n (%) 27/38 (71.1%) 27/38 (71.1%) 17/30 (56.7%) 11/25 (44.0%)
  95% CI 54.1–84.6% 54.1–84.6% 37.4–74.5% 24.4–65.1%
Switched to oral azolesb
n (%) 51/58 (87.9%) 47/55 (85.5%) 38/48 (79.2%) 29/41 (70.7%)
  95% CI 76.7–95.0% 73.3–93.5% 65.0–89.5% 54.5–83.9%
IV anidulafungin onlyb
n (%) 60/99 (60.6%) 60/99 (60.6%) 39/80 (48.8%) 26/68 (38.2%)
  95% CI 50.3–70.3% 50.3–70.3% 37.4–60.2% 26.7–50.8%
Septic shocka
n (%) 27/36 (75.0%) 25/34 (73.5%) 14/25 (56.0%) 10/22 (45.5%)
  95% CI 57.8–87.9% 55.6–87.1% 34.9–75.6% 24.4–67.8%
No septic shocka
n (%) 84/121 (69.4%) 82/120 (68.3%) 63/103 (61.2%) 45/87 (51.7%)
  95% CI 60.4–77.5% 59.2–76.5% 51.1–70.6% 40.8–62.6%

Missing and unknown global or microbiological responses were excluded from these analyses.

a

Differences between global success rates were not statistically significant (p > 0.05) at any time-point.

b

Differences between global success rates were statistically significant (p < 0.05) at all time-points.