Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Aug 15;128(1-2):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.07.011

Table 4.

Results from the proportional hazards models examining the unique risk associated with parental and sibling history of ISUDs

Variable HR 95% CI p-value
Block One
 Sibling Illicit Drugs 1.15 0.60–2.20 0.68
 Parent Illicit Drugs* 1.79 1.01–3.18 0.05
Block Two
 T1 MDD 0.91 0.46–1.80 0.78
 Sibling Illicit Drugs 1.24 0.65–2.38 0.51
 Parent Illicit Drugs 1.09 0.48–2.46 0.84
 T1 Cannabis** 5.39 2.50–11.63 0.00
 T1 Alcohol* 2.47 1.03–5.90 0.04
 Intactness of Home* 0.56 0.32–0.98 0.04
 Parent Direct Interview Density 0.83 0.39–1.74 0.62
 Sibling Direct Interview Density 1.7 0.54–2.13 0.84
 Gender 1.09 0.67–1.76 0.73
 T1 MDD × Parent Illicit Drugs* 3.09 0.99–9.64 0.05

Note.

**

p < .01;

*

p < .05.

Parent Illicit Drugs = parental history of ISUDs dichotomized as no lifetime diagnosis of an ISUD or history of any ISUD (in either parent); Sibling Illicit Drugs = sibling history of ISUDs dichotomized as no lifetime diagnosis of an ISUD or history of any ISUD (in any sibling); T1 MDD, T1 Cannabis, and T1 Alcohol = lifetime diagnosis at the T1 assessment.