Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1 Suppl 1):S145–S150. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.039

Table.

ED-based HIV testing programs reporting economic outcomes, 1996–present.

Testing
Ref Site; Study Period Strategy Type Tested, No. (%
Positive)
Costs Reported,
Type
Economic Outcomes,
2009 US$
[12] Urban teaching hospital, Midwest; July 1998–June 2002 Risk-targeted Conventional 5,504 (0.71) Budget 4,088/HIV-infected person
[8] University hospital, Cincinnati; January 1999–December 2002 Risk-targeted Conventional 5,232 (0.86) Total program 3,507/positive test
[15] Four urgent care centers, Massachusetts; January–September 2002 Routine Conventional 2,444 (2.0) Program components 6,370/positive test
7,223/HIV-infected person linked to care
[14] Mt. Sinai Hospital, Chicago; April 2003–August 2004 Routine Fingerstick rapid 1,428 (0.6) Program components and time-motion data 11,000/HIV-infected person
29,400/HIV-infected person linked to care
[10] George Washington University Medical Center, District of Columbia; September–December 2006 Routine Oral rapid 2,486 (1.1) (preliminary positive tests) Total program, based on cost of test and hourly wage for screeners 1,900/preliminary positive test
5,500/person with confirmed HIV-infection
[11] Various CDC-funded HIV counseling and testing sites; N/A Routine
Fingerstick or oral rapid
NA (1) Model-based cost analysis; data derived from the literature and various CDC-funded HIV counseling and testing projects 2,000/HIV-infected person receiving results
Conventional NA (1) Same as above 2,200/HIV-infected person receiving results
[13] Medical center ED, Boston; September 2003–May 2004 Routine Oral rapid 1,427 (0.6) Personnel only $11,800/HIV-infected person
*

Adjusted by using the consumer price index for medical services. For studies in which the dollar year was not reported, the currency was adjusted using the dollar year from the end date of the study.