Table 1.
Characteristics of participants.
| Participant | Age (years) |
Professiona | Professional experience (years) |
Experience with stroke patient (years) |
Clinical time (%) |
Workplaceb | Ratio (computer/ individual) |
|||
| Active members | ||||||||||
| A1 | 48 | OT | 25 | 19 | 50 | IFRU | 1:10 | |||
| A2 | 48 | PT | 26 | 22 | 100 | IFRU | 3:10 | |||
| A3 | 66 | SLP | 30 | 25 | 66 | Acute care | 1:1 | |||
| A4 | 62 | Program manager | 18 | 4 | 0 | Community reintegration |
1:1 | |||
| A5 | 40 | Nurse | 18 | 10 | 100 | IFRU | 1:1 | |||
| A6 | 39 | Clinical-administrative manager | 6 | 1 | 0 | IFRU | 1:1 | |||
| A7 | 47 | Clinical nurse specialist | 24 | 20 | 90 | Acute care | 1:1 | |||
| A8 | 49 | OT | 25 | 20 | 98 | Acute care | 3:5 | |||
| A9 | 64 | Neurologist | 32 | 20 | 50 | Acute care | 1:1 | |||
| Inactive members | ||||||||||
| I1 | 39 | OT | 15 | 15 | 100 | Acute care | 3:5 | |||
| I2 | 44 | OT | 21 | 20 | 100 | Health and social services center | 1:2 | |||
| I3 | 46 | Consultant nurse | 23 | 11 | 0 | Acute care | 1:1 | |||
| I5 | 47 | PT | 24 | 5 | 100 | Acute care | 3:11 | |||
| I6 | 40 | PT | 17 | 10 | 100 | Specialized acute care | 1:6 | |||
| I7 | 55 | SW | 33 | 25 | 100 | Acute care | 1:1 | |||
| I8 | 33 | Nurse | 9 | 5 | 80 | Acute care | 1:1 | |||
| I9 | 48 | Neurologist | 14 | 14 | 85 | Acute care | 1:1 | |||
| Remote members | ||||||||||
| R1 | 28 | PT | 3.5 | 3.5 | 100 | Acute care | 1:5 | |||
| R2 | 30 | OT | 7 | 2 | 100 | Community reintegration | 1:1 | |||
| R3 | 40 | Clinical nurse specialist | 10 | 2 | 100 | Community reintegration | 1:1 | |||
| R4 | 46 | Neuro-psychologist | 25 | 11 | 100 | IFRU | 2:5 | |||
| R5 | 46 | Clinical coordinator | 20 | 9 | 0 | IFRU and community reintegration | 1:1 | |||
| R6 | 37 | Program manager | 5 | 5 | 0 | IFRU and community reintegration | 1:1 | |||
a OT: occupational therapist; PT: physical therapist; SLP: speech-language pathologist; SW: social worker
b IFRU: intensive functional rehabilitation unit