Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 13;137(18):184105. doi: 10.1063/1.4766352

Table 2.

Experimental and calculated pKa’s of a series of dicarboxylic acids.

Acid   Expt.1 E+CL2 GB3 E−CL4
  n5 pK1
Azelaic 7 4.55 4.4 4.20 4.2
Suberic 6 4.52 4.6 4.19 4.3
Pimelic 5 4.48 4.5 4.17 4.2
Adipic 4 4.42 4.7 4.04 4.1
Glutaric 3 4.34 4.0 3.57 3.7
AAE     0.18 0.43 0.38
    pK2
Azelaic 7 5.41 5.3 5.18 7.1
Suberic 6 5.40 5.2 5.25 7.1
Pimelic 5 5.42 5.3 5.25 7.0
Adipic 4 5.41 5.4 5.42 7.1
Glutaric 3 5.42 5.0 5.05 6.6
AAE     0.18 0.19 1.55
    ΔpKa6
Azelaic 7 0.86 0.8 0.98 2.9
Suberic 6 0.88 0.6 1.06 2.8
Pimelic 5 0.94 0.8 1.08 2.8
Adipic 4 0.99 0.7 1.38 2.9
Glutaric 3 1.08 1.0 1.48 2.9
AAE     0.19 0.24 1.9
1

Experimental data are taken from Ref. 34.

2

E+CL refers to the simulations based on explicit solvent with charge leveling.

3

GB refers to the simulations based on the GB implicit-solvent model.

4

E−CL refers to the simulations based on explicit solvent without charge leveling.

5

n refers to the number of methylene groups in the dicarboxylic acid HO2C–(CH2)n–CO2H.

6

In all simulations, the microscopic pK1a of azelaic acid (4.85) was used as the model pKa (see Sec. 3).