Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2012 Jul 24;22(6):1361–1368. doi: 10.1002/pon.3140

Table 3.

Indirect Effects of Family and Peer Support on MVPA through Proposed Mediators (ab Paths)a

Model Data Boot Bias SE 95% CIb
Family Support
 Total 0.1007 0.1019 0.0012 0.0488 0.0232 to 0.2223
 Perceived Benefits 0.0205 0.0181 −0.0025 0.0322 −0.0420 to 0.0903
 Perceived Barriers 0.0083 0.0087 0.0004 0.0221 −0.0294 to 0.0629
 Self-efficacy 0.0719 0.0752 0.0033 0.0460 0.0060 to 0.1893
Peer Support
 Total 0.0685 0.0678 −0.0008 0.0420 −0.0052 to 0.1610
 Perceived Benefits 0.0160 0.0152 0.0007 0.0209 −0.0085 to 0.0838
 Perceived Barriers 0.0049 0.0033 −0.0017 0.0148 −0.0123 to 0.0541
 Self-efficacy 0.0477 0.0493 0.0016 0.0320 0.0038 to 0.1337

Note. MVPA: Moderate-Vigorous Physical Activity. Data: Indirect effect calculated in original sample. Boot: Mean of the indirect effect estimates calculated across all bootstrap samples. Bias: Difference between indirect effect of original sample and mean of the indirect effect estimates calculated across all bootstrap samples. SE: Standard deviation of the bootstrap estimates of the indirect effect. CI: Confidence Interval.

a

5,000 resamples

b

bias-corrected confidence intervals