Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 27;31(1):68. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-31-68

Table 1.

Clinicopathological parameters of patients, with respectively good and bad outcome

Category Gender Age Location pG pT pN pM pR PNI LVI VI Postop OS DFS
GOOD
F
55
Head
2
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
156.4
156.4
GOOD
M
32
Head
3
3
1
0
0
1
1
0
RCT
127.9
127.9
GOOD
M
78
Head
1
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
71.5
71.5
GOOD
M
53
Head
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
RCT
67.2
67.2
GOOD
F
61
Head
3
3
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
56.4
56.4
GOOD
F
62
Head
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
RCT
62.7
62.7
GOOD
M
68
Tail
3
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
CT
51.5
51.5
BAD
F
75
Head
3
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
9.4
5.2
BAD
M
72
Head
2
3
1
0
0
1
1
1
CT
12.6
5.6
BAD
M
52
Head
3
3
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
8.4
4.1
BAD
F
78
Head
2
3
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
9.9
3.6
BAD
M
59
Head
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
6.3
2.8
BAD
F
51
Head
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
CT
19.4
6.5
BAD
M
74
Tail
3
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
CT
12.3
0.5
BAD
M
50
Head
2
2
1
0
0
1
1
1
CT
9.4
7.0
BAD(M) M 67 Head       1         CT 8.3 /

F: female; M: male; pG: pathological tumour grade; pT: pathological tumour size; pN: pathological lymph node status; pM: pathological metastasis; pR: pathological resection margin; PNI: perineural invasion; VI: vascular invasion; LVI: lymphovascular invasion; RCT: radiochemotherapy; CT: chemotherapy; OS: overall survival; DFS: disease-free survival.