Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Prim Prev. 2012 Dec;33(5-6):271–278. doi: 10.1007/s10935-012-0282-z

Table.

Descriptive statistics for YMSM study participants by HIV prevention participation

HIV Prevention Participation

Variable Total
(N = 100)
No
(n = 72)
Yes
(n = 28)

No. or Mean
(% or SD)
No. or Mean
(% or SD)
No. or Mean
(% or SD)
Mean age, years (range, 19–30) 25.01 (3.00) 25.01 (2.82) 25.00 (3.48)
Race/ethnicitya**
  White 29 (29.0) 25 (34.7) 4 (14.3)
  Black 17 (17.0) 12 (16.7) 5 (17.9)
  Latino 29 (29.0) 17 (23.6) 12 (42.9)
  Asian 21 (21.0) 15 (20.8) 6 (21.4)
  Other 4 (4.0) 3 (4.2) 1 (3.6)
Highest level of educationb
  Less than high school 2 (2.0) 1 (1.4) 1 (3.7)
  High school graduate 8 (8.1) 8 (11.1) 0 (0.0)
  Associates degree, Junior College, Trade school 8 (8.1) 7 (9.7) 1 (3.7)
  Some college 42 (42.4) 30 (41.7) 12 (44.4)
  College graduate 30 (30.3) 20 (27.8) 10 (37.0)
  More than college 9 (9.1) 6 (8.3) 3 (11.1)
  In schoolc 37 (37.4) 25 (34.7) 12 (44.4)
  Currently working 79 (79.0) 59 (81.9) 20 (71.4)
  California resident 93 (93.0) 69 (95.8) 24 (85.7)
  Tested for HIV 91 (91.0) 63 (87.5) 28 (100.0)
  Tested for HIV in the past 6 monthsd** 46 (56.8) 27 (49.1) 19 (73.1)
  HIV serostatuse
   Negative 82 (83.7) 58 (80.6) 24 (92.3)
   Positive 6 (6.1) 4 (5.6) 2 (7.7)
   Unknown 10 (10.2) 10 (13.9) 0 (0.0)
Perceived HIV risk (range, 1–10)f* 2.64 (1.96) 2.28 (1.52) 3.56 (2.62)

Note. Independent sample t-test used for continuous variables, and chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Variables with category cell sizes less than 5 were not compared unless otherwise noted.

a

Comparison based on racial/ethnic minority vs. White.

b

Comparison based on college graduate vs. other (n = 99).

c

n = 99.

d

Among those ever tested for HIV (n = 81).

e

Comparison based on HIV-negative vs. other (n = 98).

f

n = 64. Higher scores indicate greater perceived HIV risk.

*

p < .10.

**

p < .05.