Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Oct 22;50:1244–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.025

Table 2.

Odds ratios from weighted logistic regression models predicting whether a crash associated with personal injury in NASS-GES (2002–2008) would also be associated with fatal injury.

Characteristic Model 1:
Including county RUCC
Model 2:
Excluding county RUCC
Sampled crashes      227,014      227,014
Weighted crash total 12,608,943 12,608,943
Baseline odds   0.000700   0.000737
     OR (95% CI)      OR (95% CI)
Age 0–14 vs. 15–39   0.71 (0.56–0.91)   0.72 (0.56–0.92)
Age 40–65 vs. 15–39   1.74 (1.53–1.99)   1.75 (1.53–2.00)
Age 65–79 vs. 15–39   3.04 (2.60–3.55)   3.05 (2.62–3.56)
Age 80+ vs. 15–39   3.78 (2.99–4.79)   3.79 (2.94–4.89)
Male   1.70 (1.56–1.84)   1.70 (1.56–1.85)
Pedestrian 20.60 (16.3–26.1) 19.93 (15.3–26.0)
Motorcyclist   2.65 (2.14–3.28)   2.59 (2.05–3.26)
Unbelted   3.14 (2.76–3.57)   3.23 (2.80–3.71)
Ejected   8.31 (7.17–9.63)   8.24 (7.10–9.57)
High speed   2.68 (2.18–3.29)   2.80 (2.45–3.20)
Vehicle rolled   1.52 (1.36–1.70)   1.52 (1.38–1.67)
Severe damage   2.92 (2.59–3.30)   2.96 (2.64–3.32)
>=2 vehicles vs. 1 vehicle   0.88 (0.78–0.99)   0.85 (0.76–0.95)
Head-on crash   2.58 (2.15–3.09)   2.71 (2.36–3.11)
12PM – 6AM   1.73 (1.59–1.88)   1.66 (1.50–1.85)
   >=2 injured persons   2.24 (2.03–2.49)   2.25 (2.03–2.50)
   >=3 injured persons   1.66 (1.49–1.85)   1.67 (1.50–1.86)
   >=4 injured persons   1.29 (1.05–1.60)   1.28 (1.03–1.59)
   >=5 injured persons   1.82 (1.41–2.35)   1.80 (1.41–2.29)
RUCC 4–5 vs. RUCC 1–3   1.26 (1.01–1.58)
RUCC 6–7 vs. RUCC 1–3   1.42 (0.88–2.30)
RUCC 8–9 vs. RUCC 1–3   1.91 (1.65–2.21)

OR=Odds Ratio, CI=Confidence Interval, RUCC=Rural-Urban Continuum Code.