Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 30;47(5):2081–2096. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01406.x

Table 3.

Results from Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Model Showing the Odds of Using Non-Provider-Based CAM and the Expected Count of Number of Non-Provider-Based CAM Types Used in the Past 12 Months*

Non-Provider-Based CAM Types N = 19,999

Odds of Using CAM Expected Count of Number of CAM Types Used


OR 95% CI p IRR 95% CI p
Delay due to inaccessibility 0.91 0.33–2.50 .849 1.49 1.42–1.57 <.001
Race/ethnicity
 White
 African American 0.53 0.26–1.11 <.10 0.77 0.72–0.83 <.001
 Hispanic 0.66 0.33–1.32 .24 0.72 0.66–0.77 <.001
 Asian 1.39 0.21–9.23 .73 0.82 0.75–0.90 <.001
Gender
 Male
 Female 3.23 1.75–5.95 <.001 1.25 1.20–1.30 <.001
Age 1.10 1.06–1.15 <.001 1.01 1.01–1.01 <.005
Education
 High school degree or less
 Some college or college degree 4.87 2.14–11.11 <.001 1.43 1.37–1.49 <.001
 Advanced/graduate degree 1.16 0.34–3.99 .817 1.76 1.64–1.88 <.001
Income 1.05 0.82–1.36 .68 1.03 1.01–1.04 <.001
Health status
 Good/very good/excellent
 Poor/fair health 0.37 0.15–0.91 <.05 1.01 0.94–1.06 .911
Health insurance
 Insured
 Uninsured 0.33 0.16–0.66 <.01 1.04 0.96–1.13 .328
*

Data are drawn from the 2007 National Health Interview Survey and have been weighted.

Because of the low number of individuals from another/multiple races who used non-provider-based CAM types, another/multiple race was not included in the analysis.

Reference category.

CAM, complementary and alternative medicine; CI, 95% confidence interval; IRR, incidence rate ratio.