Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anim Behav. 2012 Oct 1;84(4):795–803. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.034

Table 3.

Experiment 3: trial-specific observed versus predicted order of recovery

Observed (Predicted) Order of Recovery
Subject Trial Delay (min) 9N 7N 5N 3N 1N 9S 7S 5S 3S 1S r
Panzee 1 24 1(1) 2(2) 9d(3) 3(6) 8d(10) 6(5) 4d(4) 5(7) 7d(8) 10(9) 0.66*
2 21 1(1) 3(2) 2(3) 8(6) 7(10) 4(5) 5(4) 9.5(7) 6d(8) 9.5(9) 0.83**
3 131 2(1) 3(3) 1(2) 9(4) 4(9) 6(6) 5(5) 9(7) 7(8) 9(10) 0.64*
4 17 3(2) 2(3) 1d(1) 8.5(4) 8.5(9) 6(6) 5d(5) 8.5(7) 4(8) 8.510) 0.73*
5 17 1(1) 2(3) 5(2) 3(5) 10(9) 8(4) 7(6) 4(7) 9(8) 6(10) 0.65*
6 17 3(1) 1(2) 2(3) 4(6) 9(9) 5(4) 7(5) 6(7) 8(8) 10(10) 0.90**
7 27; 1421 4(2) 7(1) 1(3) 3(6) 2(7) 6(5) 10(4) 8(8) 9(9) 5(10) 0.15
8 19; 2900 1(2) 4(1) 5(3) 2(4) 3(8) 9(5) 7(6) 9(7) 6(9) 9(10) 0.55
9 18 4(2) 2(1) 1(3) 9(4) 3(10) 5(5) 7(6) 6(7) 9(8) 9(9) 0.47
10 22; 1384 4(2) 1(1) 3(3) 2(4) 8(9) 8(5) 5(6) 8(7) 8(8) 8(10) 0.85**
11 25 1(2) 4(1) 2(3) 5d(6) 3(8) 8(4) 9(5) 7(7) 10(9) 6(10) 0.48
12 16 3(1) 1(2) 2(3) 4(4) 5(8) 7(5) 9d(6) 6(7) 10(10) 8(9) 0.82**
13 17 5(1) 2(2) 1(3) 3(4) 4(10) 10(5) 6(6) 7(7) 8(8) 9(9) 0.50
14 23 5(2) 1(1) 2(3) 4(7) 3(10) 8(5) 8(4) 8(6) 8(8) 8(9) 0.37
15 21 1(1) 3(2) 2(3) 4(4) 5(9) 7(5) 9(6) 8(7) 6(8) 10(10) 0.78**
16 18 2(1) 4(2) 1(3) 3(4) 5(9) 6(5) 7(6) 9(7) 9(8) 9(10) 0.79**
17 24 4(2) 2(1) 1(3) 3(6) 5(9) 10(4) 9(5) 7(7) 8(8) 6(10) 0.38
18 17 2(1) 4(3) 3(2) 1(4) 5(9) 10d(5) 9(6) 8(7) 6(8) 7(10) 0.54
19 20 5(1) 4(2) 1(3) 2(5) 3(9) 6(4) 8(6) 9.5(7) 9.5(8) 7(10) 0.43
20 22 2(1) 3(2) 1(3) 4(5) 5(9) 7(6) 10(4) 8(7) 6(8) 9(10) 0.60

Subject Trial Delay (min) 9N 7N 5N 3N 1N 9S 7S 5S 3S 1S r

Sherman 1 20 3(1) 1(2) 8.5(3) 8.5(6) 8.5(10) 5(4) 2(5) 4(7) 8.5(8) 6(9) 0.55
2 17 2(1) 1(2) 3(4) 9(7) 9(9) 9(3) 4(5) 6(6) 5(8) 7(10) 0.62
3 20 1(1) 5(3) 8(2) 8(5) 8(9) 3(4) 4(6) 2(7) 8(8) 8(10) 0.46
4 16 4d(2) 1(1) 3(3) 9(6) 9(9) 5(5) 2(4) 7(7) 6(8) 9(10) 0.87**
5 19 3(2) 2(1) 7(3) 7(6) 7(10) 1(4) 7(5) 7(7) 7(8) 7(9) 0.68*
6 21 4d(1) 7.5(2) 7.5(3) 1d(6) 7.5(9) 2d(4) 3(5) 7.5(7) 7.5(8) 7.5(10) 0.31
7 30 3(2) 2(1) 1(3) 7(7) 9.5(9) 4d(4) 6(5) 8(6) 5(8) 9.5(10) 0.88**
8 15 1(1) 8.5(2) 4(3) 8.5(6) 8.5(10) 2(4) 3d(5) 6(7) 5d(8) 8.5(9) 0.56
9 19 1(1) 8(2) 2(3) 8(6) 8(9) 3d(4) 4(5) 5(7) 8(8) 8(10) 0.67*
10 23 2(1) 3(2) 10d(4) 8(7) 9(9) 4(3) 1(5) 5(6) 6(8) 7(10) 0.58
11 26 4(1) 1(2) 2(3) 7.5(7) 7.5(10) 3(4) 7.5(5) 7.5(6) 7.5(8) 7.5(9) 0.81**
12 16 2(1) 5(2) 3(4) 6(7) 7(9) 1(3) 9(5) 8(6) 4(8) 10(10) 0.66*
13 23 1(1) 2(2) 5(4) 9(7) 9(9) 3(3) 6(5) 4(6) 7(8) 9(10) 0.93**
14 17 1(2) 7.5(1) 7.5(3) 4(6) 7.5(10) 3(5) 2(4) 7.5(7) 7.5(8) 7.5(9) 0.43
15 25 2(1) 1(2) 3(3) 7(7) 9(9) 4(4) 5(5) 9(6) 9(8) 6(10) 0.83**
16 24 3(1) 6(2) 2(3) 7d(6) 5d(9) 8d(4) 1(5) 9.5(7) 4(8) 9.5(10) 0.44
17 29 7(1) 3(2) 2(5) 7(6) 7(9) 7(4) 1(3) 7(7) 7(8) 7(10) 0.47
18 15 1(1) 2(2) 3(3) 8(6) 8(10) 4(4) 5(5) 8(7) 8(8) 8(9) 0.94**
19 22 1(1) 2(2) 6.5(4) 6.5(6) 6.5(9) 6.5(3) 6.5(5) 6.5(7) 6.5(8) 6.5(10) 0.70*
20 19 1(1) 3(2) 2(4) 9(7) 9(10) 6(3) 4(5) 5(6) 7(8) 9(9) 0.87**

See text for methods regarding the calculation of predicted order of recovery (given in parentheses). Secondary recruitments to recover items remaining hidden after initial recruitment are denoted by italicized delay lengths; any bags recovered after secondary recruitment also denoted by italics. N = no shell, S = shell,

d

de facto recovered bag,

bag left unrecovered,

r = Pearson rank order correlation coefficient between predicted and observed recovery order,

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01.