Table 1.
Home 1 | Home 2 | Home 3 | Home 4 | Home 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Context |
Deprived ex-mining community |
Isolated rural community |
Strong management support |
Unsettled staffing with unfilled posts |
Study coincided with consultation regarding closure of the home |
|
Pride in existing menus |
Strong resistance to external guidelines |
Located on city outskirts |
Rural setting |
Health-conscious staff |
|
Compliant staff |
Pride in existing menus |
Keen to update menus |
Changes coincided with appointment of new manager and new cook |
Less emphasis on home cooking` |
|
|
Empowered staff |
Manager and head cook have experience of Slimming World1 |
|
|
Institutional support |
Manager required cooks to adhere to new menus but provided little support for cooks in dealing with negative feedback |
Manager delegated all responsibility to cooks and study team |
Manager supportive of guidelines and required cooks to adhere to new menus |
New manager keen to change menu structure |
Manager instrumental in identifying key members of care staff to contribute to the process of menu development but otherwise had little hands-on involvement |
|
|
|
|
New manager undermined implementation of guidelines by making changes based on her own preferences and ideas |
|
Approach to introducing modified menus |
Menus devised by study dietitian; emphasis on implementing the nutrition guidelines |
Some attempt to engage cooks in process of menu development but insufficient time to achieve ownership |
Emphasis on working towards the nutrition guidelines |
Emphasis on working towards the nutrition guidelines |
Emphasis on working towards the nutrition guidelines |
|
|
Menus largely devised by study dietitian |
Majority of menu development carried out by cooks |
Majority of menu development carried out by new cook |
Care staff involved in process of menu development |
|
|
Emphasis on implementing the nutrition guidelines |
Variable levels of involvement of cooks |
|
Cooks happy to let study dietitian take the lead |
|
|
|
|
|
Emphasis on changing recipes rather than dishes |
Outcomes |
Cooks working to rule and abdicating responsibility for menus to the study team |
Cooks refused to implement modified menus |
Adherence to modified menus varied between cooks |
Old cooks still providing cover tended not to stick to modified menus |
Changes largely unnoticed by clients |
|
Modified menus perceived as too extreme and restrictive |
Limited changes made |
Emphasis on sticking rigidly to modified menus |
Some dissatisfaction amongst clients |
Some variability between cooks |
|
Reported client dissatisfaction |
Some cooks implemented changes in ways intended to fail |
Little room for cooks to exercise judgement |
Cooks modified menus in light of client feedback |
Care staff more engaged and supportive of changes |
|
Problems with loose bowels due to rapid increase in fiber |
Client resistance to changes in the menu |
Tendency to revert to old dishes where new dishes unpopular rather than modifying recipes |
New manager changed menus while head cook on holiday in line with her own preferences and views |
|
Cooks waiting for study team to leave before devising new hybrid menus | Reduction in number of client falls reported by manager |
1Slimming World is a UK slimming organisation.