Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2011 Nov 30;153(2):319–330. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.10.025

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Simple slopes for the CES-D and DASS scales. The graphs suggest that the amount of time between pretest and follow-up 1 was identical to the time between follow-up 1 and follow-up 2, which it was not. The growth curve analyses modeled change as a function of the square root of time since pretest. This transformation effectively equated the amount of elapsed time between the 2 pairs of assessments. Although the graphs suggest that change was constant, the greatest changes occurred between pretest and follow-up 1. However, this transformation does not affect the end-point differences (ie, the vertical separation of the simple slopes at follow-up 2).