Table 4.
Catalyst | Acid | Linear Region [H+](mM) |
Plateau Region [H+] (mM) |
(ic/ip)maxa | k (s−1) |
Ecatb (V vs Fc+/0) |
Overpotentialc (V) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[HFe2(adtNH)(CO)2(dppv)2]+, [t-H1NH]+ |
ClCH2CO2H | 50–400 | 600–1200 | 69 | 5000 | −1.49 | 0.71 |
HFe2(adtNHH)(CO)2(dppv)2]2+, [t-H1NH2]2+ |
CF3CO2H | 20–280 | 370–750 | 167 | 58000 | −1.11 | 0.51 |
[Fe2(adtNH)(µ-H)(CO)2(dppv)2+, [µ-H1NH]+ |
ClCH2CO2H | 2–50 | 60–90 | 10 | 20 | −1.72 | 0.90 |
[HFe2(pdt)(CO)2(dppv)2]+, [t-H2]+ |
HBF4•Et2O | 1–8 | 10–20 | 5 | 5 | −1.49 | 1.32 |
[Fe2(pdt)(µ-H)(CO)2(dppv)2]+, [µ-H2]+ |
ClCH2CO2H | 2–10 | 14–40 | 3.5 | 3 | −1.78 | 0.95 |
icis the average catalytic current in the plateau region
Ecat was calculated at each acid concentration in the linear region by the method described by Fourmond, et al., considering the effects of homoconjugation for the two carboxylic acids.37 The Ecatvalues listed are averages from each acid concentration in the linear region.
Overpotential = Eo HA/H2 - Ecat, where EoHA/H2 is the standard reduction potential of the acid.37