Table 1. Calculation of number of ligands at the poles.
Entry |
1H NMR integrals |
DPTpole:DPTall:DDT* | DPTpole per NP† | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPTpole‡ | DPTall§ | C2D2Cl4 residue | -CH3 on DDT§ | |||
1 | 6.00 | 93.31 | 100 | 88.95 | 1: 15.5: 44.4 | 7.6 (5.4–10.2) |
2 | 7.82 | 172.70 | 100 | 139.73 | 1: 22.1: 53.6 | 5.1 (3.1–7.6) |
3 | 8.80 | 148.05 | 100 | 116.88 | 1: 16.8: 39.8 | 8.6 (6.4–11.1) |
4 | 10.86 | 263.05 | 100 | 148.53 | 1: 24.2: 41 | 7.2 (4.8–10.0) |
5 | 14.20 | 330.67 | 100 | 185.99 | 1: 23.3: 39.3 | 7.0 (4.3–10.4) |
6 |
12.14 |
228.41 |
100 |
113.37 |
1: 25.7: 38.3 |
6.9 (4.7–9.4) |
DDT, dodecanethiol; DPT, diphenyl thiol; NP, nanoparticle.
*Calculated by using the integral of solvent residue as a reference.
†Calculation (entry 1 as an example): (1) the average ligand number is calculated based on the particle size (458 ligands for a 4.87-nm large particle). (2) Given he value of DPTall:DDT, the average number of overall DPT per particle is calculated (118.5). (3) Given the value of DPTpole:DPTall, the average number of DPT pole ligand is calculated (7.6). (4) Considering the particle size deviation (4.87±0.82), the range of ligand number per particle is 232–613. Accordingly, the number of pole ligand is in the range of 5.4-10.2.
‡By deconvolution of NMR peak via Gaussian–Lorentzian fit.
§By NMR integral after thermal cleavage of ligands.