Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 5;103(11):2275–2286. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.10.024

Table 3.

Results for fits for a data set (290,000 data points, sampling interval τ = 0.05 ms) collected from type-II IP3R at 10 μM IP3, 5 mM ATP, 50 nM Ca2+ to different models

Model qij[ms−1] qji[ms−1] Likelihood
Q11C1O2 q12 = 2.684893 ± 0.070417 q21 = 2.721870 ± 0.072489 −141,814

Q21O3C1-C2
q12 = 0.039019 ± 0.003728 q21 = 0.086724 ± 0.008305 −125,330
q13 = 9.787732 ± 0.101025
q31 = 3.250568 ± 0.035998
Q31O4C1C2C3
q12 = 1.125150 ± 0.036311 q21 = 0.094523 ± 0.008178 −125,072
q23 = 0.004706 ± 0.001427 q32 = 0.011629 ± 0.003210
q24 = 10.065905 ± 0.139341
q42 = 3.272794 ± 0.047411
Q41C1C2C3C4O5 q12 = 0.019692 ± 0.007848 q21 = 0.329510 ± 0.169228 −125,082
q23 = 0.493762 ± 0.133622 q32 = 0.137882 ± 0.052847
q34 = 1.322551 ± 0.100999 q43 = 0.110575 ± 0.009022
q45 = 10.110514 ± 0.119087 q54 = 3.272045 ± 0.034769

Mean values and standard deviations are shown for runs of 60,000 iterations (burn-in: 30,000 iterations). Convergence plots for the model Q31 with the best likelihood score are shown in Fig. 7.