Table 3.

Adjusted Odds Ratios for Three Models of Social Network Status and Depression (CES-D ≥28) by School Type & Gender

Depression (CES-D ≥28)
Model^a	Total Sample			Academic									Professional

				All			Girls			Boys			All			Girls			Boys

	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3
Fixed Effects Estimates^b
In-Degree (Friend)	0.88^**			0.91⁺			0.91			0.89			0.84^*			0.83^*			0.85
PSSE	0.69^**			0.58^**			0.53^**			0.64^**			0.84^*			0.66^**			1.07
Age	1.06			1.04			1.07			0.93			1.07			1.10			1.04
SES	1.17^**			1.06			1.08			1.05			1.36^**			1.56^**			1.14
Female	1.48^**			1.52^**									1.52^**

Network Status (Friend)
Marginal		1.92^**			0.95			0.69			1.22			3.30^**			4.71^**			2.51^*
Peripheral		1.29^**			1.26⁺			1.25			1.28			1.38^*			1.39⁺			1.35
Accepted		ref.			ref.			ref.			ref.			ref.			ref.			ref.
Popular		0.85			0.76⁺			0.86			0.61⁺			0.96			0.98			0.97
Favorite		0.92			0.72			0.79			0.63			1.2			1.36			0.97

Network Status (Liked)
Marginal			1.14			1.24			1.33			1.17			1.04			0.81			1.44
Peripheral			1.16			1.15			1.12			1.19			1.19			1.26			1.1
Accepted			ref.			ref.			ref.			ref.			ref.			ref.			ref.
Popular			1.17			1.05			1.18			0.88			1.3			1.68^*			0.82
Favorite			1.06			0.98			1.3			0.7			1.12			1.1			1.27

Random Effects Estimates
Level 3 (School)	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01
School Type	0.14^**	0.13^**	0.12^**
Level 2 (Class)	0.11	0.11	0.16^*	0.15	0.10	0.15	0.20⁺	0.19	0.22	0.40^**	0.32^*	0.36^*	0.23^*	0.16	0.20⁺	0.05	0.02	<0.01	0.60^**	0.48^**	0.49^**

Observations	4629	4444	3937	2268	2162	1929	1202	1164	1048	1066	998	881	2361	2282	2008	1262	1229	1095	1099	1053	913

Three models were run using multilevel logistic regression: Model 1 examined in-degree (from friend nominations) as the independent variable (IV) of interest; Model 2 examined the five different network status categories from friend nominations as the IV of interest; and Model 3 examined the five network status categories from most liked nominations as the IV of interest.

The covariates were included in all three models, however, they did not differ between models and are therefore only reported under the first model for table readability.

⁺

p<0.10,

p<0.05,

^**

p<0.01