Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 5;7(12):e51087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051087

Table 2. F statistics and p-values for GLM analysis testing for differences in eyespot trait sizes across treatments.

B. anynana J. coenia
Surface Wing Trait N (5E1) N (NS1) F p N (5E1) N (NS1) F p
Ventral Forewing M1 white NA NA NA NA 82 59 2.67 0.10365
M1 black 40 48 2.37 0.09760 82 59 0.003 0.95416
M1 gold 40 48 0.19 0.82595 82 59 0.68 0.40793
Cu1 white 40 49 1.32 0.27048 82 59 29.47 <0.0000 ***
Cu1 black 40 49 3.19 0.04455 * 82 59 0.38 0.53503
Cu1 gold 40 49 4.59 0.01192 * 82 59 2.36 0.12594
Hindwing M1 inner disc NA NA NA NA 82 59 13.76 0.00026 ***
M1 gold NA NA NA NA 82 59 4.75 0.03033 *
Cu1 black/inner 37 49 1.44 0.23993 82 59 8.97 0.00305 **
Cu1 gold 37 49 0.98 0.37855 82 59 6.31 0.01271 *
Dorsal Forewing M1 white NA NA NA NA 82 59 23.13 <0.0000 ***
M1 black 40 46 0.98 0.37734 82 59 13.10 0.00036 ***
M1 gold 40 47 2.45 0.09086 82 59 12.97 0.00039 ***
Cu1 white 40 48 1.62 0.20285 82 59 14.98 0.00014 ***
Cu1 black 37 41 4.37 0.01487 * 82 59 5.07 0.02529 *
Cu1 gold 37 41 8.37 0.00040 *** 82 59 9.72 0.00206 **
Hindwing M1 inner NA NA NA NA 82 59 0.43 0.50912
M1 gold NA NA NA NA 82 59 1.49 0.22313
Cu1 inner NA NA NA NA 82 59 3.90 0.04938 *
Cu1 gold NA NA NA NA 82 59 7.98 0.00516 **

Individuals were injected with either 5E1 antibody or NS1 control media as larvae. All significant differences correspond to smaller trait sizes in the 5E1-injected individuals. GLM analyses were performed with sex (always significant across traits with females usually displaying a larger trait size than males, not shown); and interaction between line and sex (not significant in all analyses; not shown). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.