Table 3. F statistics and p-values for GLM analysis testing for differences in eyespot trait sizes across treatments using wing size as a covariate.
B. anynana | J. coenia | |||||||||
Surface | Wing | Trait | N (5E1) | N (NS1) | F | p | N (5E1) | N (NS1) | F | p |
Ventral | Forewing | M1 white | NA | NA | NA | NA | 82 | 59 | 1.381 | 0.241 |
M1 black | 40 | 48 | 0.250 | 0.618 | 82 | 59 | 0.657 | 0.419 | ||
M1 gold | 40 | 48 | 0.490 | 0.486 | 82 | 59 | 1.360 | 0.245 | ||
Cu1 white | 40 | 49 | 0.066 | 0.797 | 82 | 59 | 0.014 | 0.905 | ||
Cu1 black | 40 | 49 | 0.115 | 0.735 | 82 | 59 | 5.455 | 0.020 * | ||
Cu1 gold | 40 | 49 | 0.097 | 0.757 | 82 | 59 | 4.152 | 0.031 * | ||
Hindwing | M1 inner | NA | NA | NA | NA | 82 | 59 | 1.558 | 0.213 | |
M1 gold | NA | NA | NA | NA | 82 | 59 | 0.001 | 0.989 | ||
Cu1 black/inner | 37 | 49 | 0.063 | 0.803 | 82 | 59 | 1.023 | 0.313 | ||
Cu1 gold | 37 | 49 | 0.125 | 0.725 | 82 | 59 | 1.482 | 0.225 | ||
Dorsal | Forewing | M1 white | NA | NA | NA | NA | 82 | 59 | 0.418 | 0.519 |
M1 black | 40 | 46 | 0.049 | 0.826 | 82 | 59 | 0.612 | 0.431 | ||
M1 gold | 40 | 47 | 0.469 | 0.496 | 82 | 59 | 0.788 | 0.376 | ||
Cu1 white | 40 | 48 | 2.961 | 0.090 | 82 | 59 | 2.123 | 0.147 | ||
Cu1 black | 37 | 41 | 0.071 | 0.790 | 82 | 59 | 5.308 | 0.022 * | ||
Cu1 gold | 37 | 41 | 0.386 | 0.537 | 82 | 59 | 5.337 | 0.0218 * | ||
Hindwing | M1 inner | NA | NA | NA | NA | 82 | 59 | 0.276 | 0.600 | |
M1 gold | NA | NA | NA | NA | 82 | 59 | 0.259 | 0.611 | ||
Cu1 inner | NA | NA | NA | NA | 82 | 59 | 0.094 | 0.797 | ||
Cu1 gold | NA | NA | NA | NA | 82 | 59 | 0.318 | 0.573 |
Individuals were injected with either 5E1 antibody or NS1 control media as larvae. All significant differences correspond to smaller trait sizes in the 5E1-injected individuals. GLM analyses were performed with sex (always significant across traits with females usually displaying a larger trait size than males; not shown); interaction between line and sex (not significant in all analyses; not shown); and wing size as a covariate. *p<0.05.